Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

2017 Wrangler Reliability

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-27-2015, 04:44 PM
  #1  
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
 
gump9005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2017 Wrangler Reliability

I'm reluctant to buy the newly designed Wrangler since it will be the first model year.

How have first model year Wranglers done in the past?
Old 04-27-2015, 08:36 PM
  #2  
JK Super Freak
 
RoysRig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mile High Colorado
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gump9005
I'm reluctant to buy the newly designed Wrangler since it will be the first model year.

How have first model year Wranglers done in the past?
Maybe the question that should be asked is, what year did they not have problems.
Old 04-27-2015, 09:45 PM
  #3  
JK Super Freak

 
BlackRockBurner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Fiat is a much better partner than Mercedes : FCA over DaimlerChrysler. Fiat already proved that meeting Quality sometimes means delaying sales dates. Fiat has poured money into interiors & drivetrain. Leadership knows how to run FCA. Daimler knew how to rape.

Quality for new Wrangler should be high, they understand it's the halo platform. But if not this platform then the next will see major changes. Eventually the Wrangler will run IFS and will have to downsize.
Old 04-28-2015, 04:25 AM
  #4  
JK Enthusiast
 
BillyJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based on history, expect a leaking manifold and easily scratched dash bezel.
Old 04-28-2015, 04:33 AM
  #5  
JK Enthusiast
 
jksteve2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: coquitlam bc
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlackRockBurner
Fiat is a much better partner than Mercedes : FCA over DaimlerChrysler. Fiat already proved that meeting Quality sometimes means delaying sales dates. Fiat has poured money into interiors & drivetrain. Leadership knows how to run FCA. Daimler knew how to rape.

Quality for new Wrangler should be high, they understand it's the halo platform. But if not this platform then the next will see major changes. Eventually the Wrangler will run IFS and will have to downsize.
umm...are you high or something? the interior upgrades you see in dodge/chrysler vehicles is directly related to their old relationship with mercedes. hell the rams have mercedes keys in them.

fiat builds tiny cost effective piece of shit cars...mercedes builds quality automobiles that last a lifetime.
Old 04-28-2015, 06:51 AM
  #6  
JK Super Freak
 
jk_sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,564
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlackRockBurner
Fiat is a much better partner than Mercedes : FCA over DaimlerChrysler. Fiat already proved that meeting Quality sometimes means delaying sales dates. Fiat has poured money into interiors & drivetrain. Leadership knows how to run FCA. Daimler knew how to rape.

Quality for new Wrangler should be high, they understand it's the halo platform. But if not this platform then the next will see major changes. Eventually the Wrangler will run IFS and will have to downsize.
I don't think so. Fiat gussied up aging and spartan interiors but they also introduced a whole new set of problems. The Jeep Grand Cherokee (the new one) has had all kinds of issues, and then they blew it again with the first model year diesels. And this is a halo/flagship vehicle for Jeep.

On the other hand, back in the day, Daimler added some premium equipment to Chrysler vehicles and stepped down some Mercedes platforms for use in Chrysler vehicles. The Crossfire was a Mercedes platform and the Pacifica was Mercedes-derived. When DCA first got started, they were doing some nice things. They did f* the Wrangler to holy hell in all its plastic glory and the 3.8 wasn't well-received (nor was it new/interesting technology) at the time.

Originally Posted by jksteve2013
umm...are you high or something? the interior upgrades you see in dodge/chrysler vehicles is directly related to their old relationship with mercedes. hell the rams have mercedes keys in them.

fiat builds tiny cost effective piece of shit cars...mercedes builds quality automobiles that last a lifetime.
Weeeelllll... like I said above, DCA vehicles had Mercedes bits here and there but they didn't redesign all of Chrysler's vehicles on Mercedes platforms, and especially not the JK. Most of the time DCA was in bed with itself was an era of horribly cheap interiors and cost-cutting measures due to a failing economy. It was a period when staple vehicles like the Dodge Caravan and Chrysler T&C vans were eclipsed by Honda and Toyota. One of the saving graces to come out of that time period was the LX platform (Magnum, Charger, 300, etc).


SO that was the long answer...the short answer is no, I'm done buying first model year vehicles especially from Chrysler/FCA. The 3.6 in my 2012 Wrangler is ticky but doesn't tick enough nor does it set a CEL and I'm seriously hoping it just blows up while it's still under warranty. A buddy bought a brand new GC back in 2012 and it was in the shop more than 18 times in the first year, mostly for software problems and a couple of DOA incidents towed straight to the dealership. The Cherokee had a delayed launch due to quality issues. I'll be waiting 1, maybe 2 years (at least!) beyond the debut of a new model/platform, to buy. It's clear automakers are more interested in getting to market than they are waiting, and producing a vehicle that doesn't have obvious problems out the gate.

Last edited by jk_sea; 04-28-2015 at 06:58 AM.
Old 04-28-2015, 06:58 AM
  #7  
JK Jedi

 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: missoula,mt
Posts: 4,364
Received 107 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

No one will know how the new platform will hold up for at least until the first week of availability lol.
Old 04-28-2015, 08:11 AM
  #8  
JK Junkie
 
red2010rubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Indianapolis, in
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do we even know for sure that there will be a new platform in 2017? I am optimistic
Old 04-28-2015, 11:02 AM
  #9  
Former Vendor
 
TOTL Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jksteve2013
fiat builds tiny cost effective piece of shit cars
Ferrari and Maserati....
Old 04-28-2015, 11:31 AM
  #10  
JK Junkie

 
DunnyBunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TOTL Innovations

Ferrari and Maserati....
Right. Every manufacturer has cost effective POS cars.


Quick Reply: 2017 Wrangler Reliability



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 PM.