Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

38s or 40s? and what size rims

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-26-2014, 01:44 PM
  #11  
JK Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
bigsikpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Washington
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went with 37's....and I use mine....Thx for helping me out with the decision
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	ForumRunner_20141126_144326.jpg
Views:	360
Size:	47.1 KB
ID:	585773   Click image for larger version

Name:	ForumRunner_20141126_144342.jpg
Views:	326
Size:	45.6 KB
ID:	585774  
Old 11-26-2014, 03:16 PM
  #12  
JK Freak
 
SoK66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 771
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Maertz;3787475]Im scared of 37's on my 44./QUOTE]

No reason at all to be. Stock JK Rubi D44s handle 37s just fine provided some common sense is used re: axle reinforcement up front & upgraded shafts in the rear. I've run 37" KM2s, then MTR/Ks for 45k, originally on MT CIIs, then TR HD beadlocks , no issues whatsoever. My rig is no mall crawler, I'm 2 1/2 hours from Moab and over there a lot.

As for the OPs question re: 38s / 40s, whoa. 37 is pretty much the limit before you have to face up to axle upgrades. 38 vs 37 doesn't sound like much, but the weight difference is significant and virtualy all 38s are 14.5" width. Meanwhile 40s take you into a whole 'nother realm of required beef.
Old 11-26-2014, 04:48 PM
  #13  
JK Freak
 
MOPWR2U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: -
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just went through the 37 vs 38 vs 40 decision making process this week. I've got a 3" lift on my JK, so with flat fenders I was thinking I could go to 40s pretty easily. Then you start adding up the cost...

For me to trade in my current 35s for 37s it cost me $800.77 for the new tires (got the price quote today), and I don't have to spend a penny on the rest of the Jeep.

For me to change to 40s it cost me $1208 for the tires, but I have to add $360 for the flat fenders, $1600 for 5.13 or 5.38 gears, and another $2200 for Ram Assist. So the 40" tires cost me $5368, vs $800 for the 37s. And that is coming from someone that already has the Dana 60 axles.

I didn't think it was worth the extra $4600 for 40s. I don't like the lack of tire coverage with flat fenders when wheeling in muddy terrain, which is about 3/4 of the year around here. And I don't like the decrease in hillclimbing capability with a short wheelbase Jeep that is not stretched, and sitting at the extra height that comes with 40s. I went with 37s. How boring is that?

Last edited by MOPWR2U; 11-26-2014 at 06:16 PM.
Old 11-26-2014, 06:27 PM
  #14  
JK Junkie
 
JE8154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Madison, New Jersey
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MOPWR2U
I just went through the 37 vs 38 vs 40 decision making process this week. I've got a 3" lift on my JK, so with flat fenders I was thinking I could go to 40s pretty easily. Then you start adding up the cost...

For me to trade in my current 35s for 37s it cost me $800.77 for the new tires (got the price quote today), and I don't have to spend a penny on the rest of the Jeep.

For me to change to 40s it cost me $1208 for the tires, but I have to add $360 for the flat fenders, $1600 for 5.13 or 5.38 gears, and another $2200 for Ram Assist. So the 40" tires cost me $5368, vs $800 for the 37s. And that is coming from someone that already has the Dana 60 axles.

I didn't think it was worth the extra $4600 for 40s. I don't like the lack of tire coverage with flat fenders when wheeling in muddy terrain, which is about 3/4 of the year around here. And I don't like the decrease in hillclimbing capability with a short wheelbase Jeep that is not stretched, and sitting at the extra height that comes with 40s. I went with 37s. How boring is that?
You're running 37's on a 3" lift with stock fender flares? How much bump stop do you have? Hydro assist isn't something you only need or will want with 40's. It really makes wheeling so much more enjoyable when you can actually steer.
Old 11-27-2014, 04:37 AM
  #15  
JK Enthusiast
 
petef550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: South of heaven
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MOPWR2U
I just went through the 37 vs 38 vs 40 decision making process this week. I've got a 3" lift on my JK, so with flat fenders I was thinking I could go to 40s pretty easily. Then you start adding up the cost...

For me to trade in my current 35s for 37s it cost me $800.77 for the new tires (got the price quote today), and I don't have to spend a penny on the rest of the Jeep.

For me to change to 40s it cost me $1208 for the tires, but I have to add $360 for the flat fenders, $1600 for 5.13 or 5.38 gears, and another $2200 for Ram Assist. So the 40" tires cost me $5368, vs $800 for the 37s. And that is coming from someone that already has the Dana 60 axles.

I didn't think it was worth the extra $4600 for 40s. I don't like the lack of tire coverage with flat fenders when wheeling in muddy terrain, which is about 3/4 of the year around here. And I don't like the decrease in hillclimbing capability with a short wheelbase Jeep that is not stretched, and sitting at the extra height that comes with 40s. I went with 37s. How boring is that?
Do the DIY ram assist for about $500.
Old 11-27-2014, 06:34 AM
  #16  
JK Freak
 
MOPWR2U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: -
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yah, I didn't spend a lot of time researching a ram assist. I went to PSC's web page and looked at one of their better systems, and it was $2200. I also guessed a little low on flat fenders for $360. After more research, most of the flat fenders that include inner fender liners, which I would want, at least in front, are about $700. So, to do it right, ... the difference for me becomes:

37s = $800

40s = $5700

And my wife just spent $6000 on new carpet for 1/3 of the house. Guess you know why I went with 37s.

.
.
.

I would be interested in hearing more real world opinions on how 40" tires can affect hillclimbing ability on a standard wheelbase 2 door JK. If anyone can report on that I'd like to hear it.
Old 11-27-2014, 08:31 AM
  #17  
JK Freak
 
MOPWR2U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: -
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JE8154
You're running 37's on a 3" lift with stock fender flares? How much bump stop do you have?
I thought everyone knew that a Teraflex 3" lift, on a two door JK, really gives you 4 1/2" of lift. That's what I have, a 4 1/2" tall, 3" lift, and the 37s fit fine. Jeep already trimmed the pinch seam on 2013 and newer JKs, so all I had to trim is the plastic inner fender liner at the back part of the rear fenders.
Old 11-27-2014, 08:54 AM
  #18  
JK Junkie
 
Invest2m4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MOPWR2U
I thought everyone knew that a Teraflex 3" lift, on a two door JK, really gives you 4 1/2" of lift. That's what I have, a 4 1/2" tall, 3" lift, and the 37s fit fine. Jeep already trimmed the pinch seam on 2013 and newer JKs, so all I had to trim is the plastic inner fender liner at the back part of the rear fenders.
Lift height has no effect on the amount of bump stop needed. You have to stop uptravel at the same spot regardless of lift height. He was asking about bump stops because you'd need a lot to run 37s with stock fenders. The downside to your setup is you're losing a lot of travel and creating a higher center of gravity.
Old 11-27-2014, 10:25 AM
  #19  
JK Junkie
 
JE8154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Madison, New Jersey
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MOPWR2U
I thought everyone knew that a Teraflex 3" lift, on a two door JK, really gives you 4 1/2" of lift. That's what I have, a 4 1/2" tall, 3" lift, and the 37s fit fine. Jeep already trimmed the pinch seam on 2013 and newer JKs, so all I had to trim is the plastic inner fender liner at the back part of the rear fenders.
Originally Posted by Invest2m4
Lift height has no effect on the amount of bump stop needed. You have to stop uptravel at the same spot regardless of lift height. He was asking about bump stops because you'd need a lot to run 37s with stock fenders. The downside to your setup is you're losing a lot of travel and creating a higher center of gravity.
Yea, I ended up looking through the pictures you have on photo bucket. It looks like you're cheating yourself out of a lot of shock up travel running like 4" front bump stops.
Old 11-27-2014, 10:33 AM
  #20  
JK Newbie
 
Wsullivan1221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Va
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Like everyone else has said, if you want 40s you will need new axles, driveshafts and some (optional) not as important things for precaution (I.e steering assist, superchargered, 8 lug bolt pattern). If you have all those things, you should have one hell of a Jeep... But probably no more money


Quick Reply: 38s or 40s? and what size rims



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 AM.