Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anyone do a 3.8 stroker kit?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-08-2012, 08:17 AM
  #21  
JK Super Freak
 
DeucesALLin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan0260
Actually you are wrong. There are a large number of these motors consuming oil, with more showing up every day. It is a known and common problem with these motors. Of course Chrysler and the dealerships don't want us to know the extent of the issue. I'm glad you haven't had issues with yours, but many including myself have. As far as the original post, I personally wouldn't waste a dime on this motor trying to modify it internally
... Well I was afraid mine was a grenade without a pin until some other Jedis convinced me I was in the majority. I personally think the new Jeep owner has unrealistic expectations about a solid axle/body on frame/somewhat-submersible brick and trades them in. However, it seems to me that its about assembly of the bottom end. I am fine with rebuilding a junkyard block for lower comp./higher boost.

I agree though that besides a QUALITY rebuild there is nothing to be gained on these 3.8s besides cam and boost. If you CAN offset the factory crank for a BUDGET stroker- why not though, right?
Old 10-08-2012, 10:17 AM
  #22  
JK Freak
 
Runewolf1973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Red deer, Alberta
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan0260
Actually you are wrong. There are a large number of these motors consuming oil, with more showing up every day. It is a known and common problem with these motors. Of course Chrysler and the dealerships don't want us to know the extent of the issue. I'm glad you haven't had issues with yours, but many including myself have. As far as the original post, I personally wouldn't waste a dime on this motor trying to modify it internally
I agree, and my '09 burns a fair bit of oil as well. I usually add another full quart in between oil changes. I still have the warranty on my motor and if I were to try modifying it, I can probably say goodbye to both my warranty and the money spent trying to upgrade an oil-burner.
Old 10-08-2012, 01:33 PM
  #23  
JK Enthusiast
 
hardcoreoffroad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Monroe Mi.
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default stroked 3.8 HESCO

Hesco has 3 diferent stroked 3.8 engins. they are around $4,000.oo . I have considerd this option as an alternative to a hemi swap. They have a 3.8 stroker with low compression pistions for super charger or turbo kits , and high compression pistons for normal asperated engines. the downside is that they are short blocks and you have to transfer everything over to the new block.
Old 10-08-2012, 03:18 PM
  #24  
JK Super Freak
 
DeucesALLin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hardcoreoffroad
Hesco has 3 diferent stroked 3.8 engins. they are around $4,000.oo . I have considerd this option as an alternative to a hemi swap. They have a 3.8 stroker with low compression pistions for super charger or turbo kits , and high compression pistons for normal asperated engines. the downside is that they are short blocks and you have to transfer everything over to the new block.
I looked and didnt see anything about them being strokers.
Old 10-08-2012, 03:47 PM
  #25  
JK Super Freak
 
Redman333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RoysRig

x2 on this. Welcome to altitude. And Forced Induction is really the only answer up here. More volume in the combustion chamber just means its got to find that much more air. BTW.... Turbos love it up here.
I agree completely. When I drove across country with my V8 mustang it felt like I was driving a 4 cyl once I got high enough. I had to constantly downshift to 3rd just to keep speed. When I drove across country in my turbo'd 3.5l V6 Nissan 350Z I barely noticed any power loss. Never had to shift out of 6th either.

I'd go forced induction all the way if I was high altitude. Why stroke it only to lose it due to being in high altitude?
Old 10-08-2012, 05:37 PM
  #26  
JK Super Freak
 
highoctane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The thing about the stroker kit would be the type of components used. Are the pistons, rods and cranked forged? Or are they cast, maybe hypereutectic pistons? If it's forged components, I'd throw a RIPP on the thing with the forged stroker crank and throw like 14lbs of boost at it. Obviously use some good head gaskets and an ARP head stud kit. But some nice boost would make that motor more of an animal. The block is pretty strong from what I hear/read. Just the factory cast components are the weak point with boost.
Old 10-08-2012, 06:15 PM
  #27  
JK Freak
 
Flip94ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bath, Oh
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FI is the only way to go at altitude. Asking the mediocre heads to feed even more cubes that a stroker kit adds is just a recipe for a huge disappointment at altitude. Turbos and blowers were originally developed for airplane engines to offer sea level performance at high altitude.

Turbo's fit the bill even better at altitude because of the waste gate design limits max boost allowing the turbo to spin as much as needed to reach that boost where as blowers will see some reduction in boost at altitude versus sea level because of the pulley selection. As in 10 psi would be perfect at altitude, but at sea level that same pulley would over boost to 14psi. The turbo, with it's waste gate, would just release the extra pressure above 10psi.

But a twin screw or a turbo would be a better pick than a hemi. I don't get all the hemi love on here, the block weighs a ton and takes away from the nimble nature of the JK. I could under stand an LS1 style all aluminum swap but why throw a lump of iron under the hood.
Old 10-08-2012, 07:00 PM
  #28  
JK Super Freak
 
DeucesALLin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

an all aluminum 5.3 would be chhhhheeeeaaaaap. Hot Rod has made a 430hp 4.8L junkyard LS screamer and 700hp with a huffer on a $500 shortblock.

I traded a 3kGT with a T70 single on 3L for my JK because I was sick of dissasembly for every friggin thing. My WRX had a single VF22 on 2.5L . My F250 had a turbo on 7.4L. Yet my favorite daily driver was my Eaton twin screw'd 5.4L.

I wouldnt ever do a hemi...and your 3.8 actually makes more hp/cube than the hemi with lower mass. A stroker is do able though not for many cubes more. And the heads make top end power limited, so you can skip forged internals and keeps costs down.

It is doable. I have an empty engine stand and micrometer- donate an oil burning top end and ill get to work! A few measurements and I bet we can find some DSM rods to match an offset ground crank to!
Old 10-08-2012, 07:02 PM
  #29  
JK Super Freak
 
DeucesALLin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

*edit*

The 5.3L would be the CHEAP part. Bellhousing, flywheel and can-bus will NOT be. *whisper: motec*
Old 10-08-2012, 08:00 PM
  #30  
JK Super Freak
 
RoysRig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mile High Colorado
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redman333
I agree completely. When I drove across country with my V8 mustang it felt like I was driving a 4 cyl once I got high enough. I had to constantly downshift to 3rd just to keep speed. When I drove across country in my turbo'd 3.5l V6 Nissan 350Z I barely noticed any power loss. Never had to shift out of 6th either.

I'd go forced induction all the way if I was high altitude. Why stroke it only to lose it due to being in high altitude?

Raced at Bandimere for years. I love displacement, but would love a turbo even more up here.


Quick Reply: anyone do a 3.8 stroker kit?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:46 AM.