Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

jeep build with a super 60/sterling setup

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-21-2014, 01:48 PM
  #141  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, Thought I would post my numbers... They varied from my original plan when I had to move my upper link up a bit. But overall, not bad

Click image for larger version

Name:	3-link model.jpg
Views:	427
Size:	72.6 KB
ID:	576605
Old 09-21-2014, 06:34 PM
  #142  
JK Enthusiast
 
Ringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chardon, OH
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You might want to play with things a bit. Over 8 degrees of roll oversteer will provide some poor and scary handling characteristics. You either want that to be zero, or negative(roll understeer).
Old 09-21-2014, 07:49 PM
  #143  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, try this again... Yeah, I have been doing a ton of research to see what I can do about that. Looking at that calculator, the roll angle is primarily based on link angle and toe. I can change that up a bit. I am also not sure on the COG. I have heard that its the top bolt of the bell housing to the centre of the crankshaft. I am not sure which.

It looks like the best I can do is about 4 degrees without relocating my gas tank. Better than my current 8 degrees.

Last edited by 2climbbig; 09-22-2014 at 07:12 PM.
Old 09-29-2014, 06:26 AM
  #144  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I am having issues with my front wheel speed sensors. They were working for a while but last week, I got a check engine light and recieved 3 error codes from the wheel speed sensors. I cleared the codes and cleaned the sensors and they worked fine for a week. Last night, the check engine light came back on and within a couple of minutes, my speedometer went out. If it turn the engine off, then turn it back own, the speedometer will work for a few seconds then quit again. Both the senors are new from ford. I split the wire leading out from the sensor into the jeep wire.

So, I know it can work, but it seems like if anything gets on that sensor, its no longer reading correctly. So, my limited understanding of electricity and how the sensor works is that there is a magnet and a coil in the sensor. A magnetic field is generated by the teeth in the tone ring. This signal will vary in amplitude and frequency which the Jeeps computer interprets and converts into a speed.

I currently have a .09 inch gap (ford design) between the sensor and the ring. The tolerance for the sensor is .05 to .1 inch. I am wondering, if I reduce the air gap between the sensor and the tone ring, will the magnetic field increase and therefore increase the signal? My alternative is to have some customer sensors made... not to expensive, but not cheap either.

Last edited by 2climbbig; 09-29-2014 at 06:30 AM. Reason: typos
Old 11-30-2014, 05:39 PM
  #145  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, I have figured out what the issue is with my front wheel speed sensors. To get the voltage equal to jeep you have to have an air gap of .05 inches. The sensor depth is .700 inches and the tone ring depth is .750 inches. This creates a .05 inch air gap. I played with differences and found .050 works best. Even .005 inch variance gave me problems.

Summary, you can use the ford sensor and splice it to the jk wire. Use as much of the jeep wire to keep resistance the same as mine. A change in resistance changes the voltage and thus you may have to change the air gap.

I have been on the new set up for 3 weeks with no issues.
Old 02-08-2015, 03:04 PM
  #146  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got to play this weekend and did a bunch of 4's and the ground was pretty wet so it made it even more unpredictable. Anyway, climbed up on a rock and thought I would share...

Click image for larger version

Name:	SAM_1342-1.jpg
Views:	378
Size:	84.5 KB
ID:	595960
Click image for larger version

Name:	SAM_1346-1.jpg
Views:	353
Size:	66.1 KB
ID:	595961
Click image for larger version

Name:	SAM_1358.jpg
Views:	361
Size:	98.6 KB
ID:	595962

Thinking maybe I need bead locks.
Old 02-08-2015, 03:06 PM
  #147  
JK Junkie
 
Invest2m4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Is your Jeep Purple?! Or just the pictures make it look that way?
Old 02-08-2015, 04:11 PM
  #148  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



No, its Red Rock/maroon. The light really does something to it.

It handled really well. No hopping, not tippy, really predictable. Really happy with it.
Old 05-16-2016, 09:49 AM
  #149  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
2climbbig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, I have made some modification to the jeep and just wanted to post it. First, I have removed those ugly a$$ lower control mounts for the front axle and replaced them with cleaner lines. It does move up my mounting position and erodes street performance a bit, but I can afford that.

I had already cut off the old ones before thinking to snap a picture, so hence the first photo

Click image for larger version

Name:	LCA before after.jpg
Views:	288
Size:	847.4 KB
ID:	647242

Click image for larger version

Name:	LCA Old vs New 2.jpg
Views:	317
Size:	2.63 MB
ID:	647243
Old 05-20-2016, 05:15 PM
  #150  
JK Enthusiast
 
Pthorpe84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 164
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks great!


Quick Reply: jeep build with a super 60/sterling setup



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 PM.