anyone do a 3.8 stroker kit?
#12
JK Super Freak
x2 on this. Welcome to altitude. And Forced Induction is really the only answer up here. More volume in the combustion chamber just means its got to find that much more air. BTW.... Turbos love it up here.
#13
JK Super Freak
Originally Posted by DocFuller
Why the upper end loss? Can't just be from high revs...
I would go positive displacement or turbo. A pair or IHIs where the battery is would be sweeeeeeeeeet.I so wish i still had my T70 from my 3kGT... :evil:
#14
JK Super Freak
Originally Posted by RoysRig
x2 on this. Welcome to altitude. And Forced Induction is really the only answer up here. More volume in the combustion chamber just means its got to find that much more air. BTW.... Turbos love it up here.
#15
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Posts: 11,035
Likes: 0
Received 80 Likes
on
72 Posts
Originally Posted by DeucesALLin
I pesonally disagree with a hemi swap. Forced i duction is way lighter and easier to work on... check out the guy rolling 39s with a $4 sprintex/spinex? Kit. Thats the direction Id go.
#16
JK Super Freak
Originally Posted by Ryan0260
So you would rather have an oil burning 3.8 or a 3.6 with bad heads? The hemi is a much better motor. But yes forced induction is much more cost effective
#18
JK Super Freak
... and MOST of the 3.8s were fine on oil consumption. The new breed of Jeeper is just more active on the forums when persuing any answer besides what the stealership or warranty trolls tell them.
#19
JK Super Freak
Originally Posted by JKingAround
Turbo much better than a super charger if your going that route
#20
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Posts: 11,035
Likes: 0
Received 80 Likes
on
72 Posts
Originally Posted by DeucesALLin
... and MOST of the 3.8s were fine on oil consumption. The new breed of Jeeper is just more active on the forums when persuing any answer besides what the stealership or warranty trolls tell them.