Acceptable pinion angle?
Go out to Tom Woods website, he has a bunch of info including a few pics of the angles you want. Stock driveshaft, pinion roughly parallel to the tcase output. Double cardan, pinion pointed at the tcase output (inline with the driveshaft). Up front, there is a compromise between caster and pinion.

Last edited by nthinuf; Apr 27, 2015 at 04:42 PM.
Go out to Tom Woods website, he has a bunch of info including a few pics of the angles you want. Stock driveshaft, pinion roughly parallel to the tcase output. Double cardan, pinion pointed at the tcase output (inline with the driveshaft). Up front, there is a compromise between caster and pinion.
Attachment 608480
Attachment 608481
Attachment 608480
Attachment 608481
.
Why in the world would you replace a drive shaft with true CV joints on each end with a shaft that has a pseudo-CV (double Cardin) on one end and a standard U-joint (single Cardin) on the other? Unless you are going to be bouncing your drive shaft off rocks or you have already damaged your stock drive shaft, there is absolutely no reason to change it. There is absolutely no drive shaft design better for high speed driving (least vibration and wear) than the CV joint. 
If you do drive primarily off road and especially over rocks, then by all means, change to an after-market unit designed for those conditions. Just remember, you can't juggle Jell-O. An improvement in one characteristic will result at the cost of another.

If you do drive primarily off road and especially over rocks, then by all means, change to an after-market unit designed for those conditions. Just remember, you can't juggle Jell-O. An improvement in one characteristic will result at the cost of another.
Why in the world would you replace a drive shaft with true CV joints on each end with a shaft that has a pseudo-CV (double Cardin) on one end and a standard U-joint (single Cardin) on the other? Unless you are going to be bouncing your drive shaft off rocks or you have already damaged your stock drive shaft, there is absolutely no reason to change it. There is absolutely no drive shaft design better for high speed driving (least vibration and wear) than the CV joint. 
If you do drive primarily off road and especially over rocks, then by all means, change to an after-market unit designed for those conditions. Just remember, you can't juggle Jell-O. An improvement in one characteristic will result at the cost of another.

If you do drive primarily off road and especially over rocks, then by all means, change to an after-market unit designed for those conditions. Just remember, you can't juggle Jell-O. An improvement in one characteristic will result at the cost of another.

i've tossed the idea of just running a stock shaft and finding a take-off somewhere but with that comes the issue of fitment. no body knows if a 6spd shaft is interchangeable with an auto, or if one from a rubicon is interchangeable with a non rubicon. so as far as replacement goes, it's still easier to just get a 1310 driveshaft.
yes i do love the Rzeppa CV on these and i wish they were serviceable.
Last edited by chknkatsu; Apr 27, 2015 at 06:01 PM.
Why in the world would you replace a drive shaft with true CV joints on each end with a shaft that has a pseudo-CV (double Cardin) on one end and a standard U-joint (single Cardin) on the other? Unless you are going to be bouncing your drive shaft off rocks or you have already damaged your stock drive shaft, there is absolutely no reason to change it. There is absolutely no drive shaft design better for high speed driving (least vibration and wear) than the CV joint. 
If you do drive primarily off road and especially over rocks, then by all means, change to an after-market unit designed for those conditions. Just remember, you can't juggle Jell-O. An improvement in one characteristic will result at the cost of another.

If you do drive primarily off road and especially over rocks, then by all means, change to an after-market unit designed for those conditions. Just remember, you can't juggle Jell-O. An improvement in one characteristic will result at the cost of another.

FYI - We are still running the stock driveshaft in the rear of that JK.
Thanks for running the Dynatrac Ball Joints. We deeply appreciate your recommendation to others.



