Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Post lift allignment

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-02-2016, 05:33 AM
  #1  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 207 Likes on 181 Posts
Default Post lift allignment

Here's a complex problem for those that love doing some front end alignment math as it involves multiple stages of mods and alignment checks.

Phase 1: Pre-Lift height and alignment check (stock)

Height (measured from ground through center of wheel to bottom of fender/ measurements same on both sides)
Front = 35 3/8"
Rear= 35 3/8"


Alignment check:



Result: Toe is out.
Shop recommendation: Inner Tie rod end and drag link needs to be replaced for proper toe adjustment.

Last edited by Rednroll; 08-02-2016 at 06:59 AM.
Old 08-02-2016, 05:34 AM
  #2  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 207 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Phase 2: Lift additions

MODS:

- Mopar 2in Lift P/N: 77070089 (CAM Bolts not used for caster correction)
- TF Front HD adjustable Track Bar
- Spyder Trax 1.5in Wheel spacers
- RC X-Flex Front Lower Adjustable Control Arms (Used for caster correction in place of CAM bolts).

Front LCA length calculation and installed length: 22 13/16in


Height (measured from ground through center of wheel to bottom of fender/ measurements same on both sides, taken after 1K miles):
Front: 38 1/2in (3 1/8in Increase)
Rear: 38 1/4in (2 7/8in Increase)

Phase 3: Front Bumper, winch and replacement steering components

MODS:

- Synergy HD Drag Link (Adjusted to stock length 40 3/4")
- Ruff Stuff HD Tie Rod (Adjusted to stock length 58 3/8")
- Mopar Quick Disconnect front links
- AEV Front Bumper
- AEV Front Winch Plate and Tow loops
- AEV Front Skid Plate
- Badlands 12K Winch (No winch cable)

Pre-Alignment Check:


Shop Alignment adjustments:
- Tie rod adjusted for toe
- Drag link adjusted for steering wheel centering

Post-Alignment Check:


Result:
- Toe is properly aligned
- Left/Front Camber is slightly out by 3/10s of a Degree
- Caster is out on both sides

Shop recommendations:

- Camber: If pulling starts on Left, will need Camber Sleeve kit installed, adjustable ball joints.
- Caster: Increase Length of front adjustable LCA's, Adjust Right Front 1/2 turn more than Left Front LCA.

MOD
- Add 94' of synthetic rope to winch and winch fairlead.
- Remove HEAVY Speaker Box from Rear (40"x23"x19" MDF construction)
- (2) 12" Subs, 4 Amplifiers, (2) 6x9 speakers


Height Measurement: (Post bumper/winch install and Speaker box removal)
Front= 37 3/4" (2 3/8" increase)
Rear= 38 3/4" (3 3/8" increase)

Last edited by Rednroll; 08-02-2016 at 06:45 AM.
Old 08-02-2016, 05:35 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 207 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Any thoughts on how much further I need to increase the length of my Front LCA's to correct my caster?

What am shooting for in regards to caster, isn't it 4-6 degrees for Caster?

Last edited by Rednroll; 08-02-2016 at 06:55 AM.
Old 08-02-2016, 06:23 AM
  #4  
JK Super Freak
 
kaptkrappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Punta Gorda, FL.
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Why is the shop recommending you replace the tie rod, it's adjustable ??


.
Old 08-02-2016, 06:58 AM
  #5  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 207 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaptkrappy
Why is the shop recommending you replace the tie rod, it's adjustable ??


.
They couldn't get a good adjustment out of it, they said the inner tie rod end needed to be replaced. There was 117K miles on the stock tie rod, I could hear/feel popping sound. The inner tie rod end needed to be replaced, so instead of just doing the inner tie rod, I decided it was time to replace and upgrade to an HD tie rod.

I now edited my original post for further details in regards to their recommendation.
Old 08-02-2016, 07:30 AM
  #6  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 363 Likes on 289 Posts
Default

You just have to settle on the caster as it becomes a balance of steering feel and driveline vibrations. You will likely never get back to factory caster spec lifted that high unless you go to a caster corrected axle.
Old 08-02-2016, 09:15 AM
  #7  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 207 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
You just have to settle on the caster as it becomes a balance of steering feel and driveline vibrations. You will likely never get back to factory caster spec lifted that high unless you go to a caster corrected axle.
Honestly, with the alignment currently where it is, I'm not really noticing any pull and it feels fine. I took a road trip to Northern Michigan and back this weekend right after the alignment was done, clocked about 500 highway miles round trip and it seemed fine. I was just worried that maybe with the caster where it is, if it might eventually cause front drive-shaft or any other problems where I could benefit by extending the length of the lower control arms a tad to put the caster closer to that 4-6 deg area.

I was thinking of dropping the LCA's increasing the length of the passenger side by 2.5 turns and the driver side by 2 turns, take it for a spin for a week to see how it feels and then take it back in for another alignment check to see where it's at. The shop provides free alignment checks, so it wouldn't cost me anything except for my time dropping and adjusting the LCA's.

Last edited by Rednroll; 08-02-2016 at 09:22 AM.
Old 08-02-2016, 09:35 AM
  #8  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 363 Likes on 289 Posts
Default

I guess you don't understand what I am talking about.
Old 08-02-2016, 10:38 AM
  #9  
JK Freak
 
larry0071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

What Dirtman is saying is that as you chase caster, you go bad on pinion angle and move closer and closer to driveline related vibration and transfer case housing failure/damage. As you go after proper driveshaft/yoke alignment to save the transfer case and driveshaft, you go further and further away from "nice driving" caster. The only way to have both is to have a caster corrected housing. So you can get your longer lower arms or you can use geometry correction brackets to flatten out and push forward the lower control arms.... but you do so while compromising the driveshaft to pinion yoke angle. Ideally, you want your 5 degrees of caster and you want your pinion yoke to driveshaft angle as close to aligned straight as possible. The more angle you add to that front U-Joint, the more U-joint whip you have feeding back as vibration and also causing stress on the transfer case housing around the area of the front output bearing.

Everyone is between a rock and a hard place in respect to that situation. I would leave your stuff alone and not chase caster if your finding the steering to be acceptable. No reason to push the issue in search of a number on an alignment machine and cause yourself heartache and pain elsewhere.
Old 08-02-2016, 01:46 PM
  #10  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Rednroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,468
Received 207 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
I guess you don't understand what I am talking about.
Absolutely NOT!!!


Originally Posted by larry0071
What Dirtman is saying is that as you chase caster, you go bad on pinion angle and move closer and closer to driveline related vibration and transfer case housing failure/damage. As you go after proper driveshaft/yoke alignment to save the transfer case and driveshaft, you go further and further away from "nice driving" caster. The only way to have both is to have a caster corrected housing. So you can get your longer lower arms or you can use geometry correction brackets to flatten out and push forward the lower control arms.... but you do so while compromising the driveshaft to pinion yoke angle. Ideally, you want your 5 degrees of caster and you want your pinion yoke to driveshaft angle as close to aligned straight as possible. The more angle you add to that front U-Joint, the more U-joint whip you have feeding back as vibration and also causing stress on the transfer case housing around the area of the front output bearing.

Everyone is between a rock and a hard place in respect to that situation. I would leave your stuff alone and not chase caster if your finding the steering to be acceptable. No reason to push the issue in search of a number on an alignment machine and cause yourself heartache and pain elsewhere.
But now I do!!!

I guess I just always read that 5-6 deg of caster was best for lifted JK's, so that's the magic bullet I was chasing after. I wasn't sure of any associated problems of being below that where I'm currently at. It sounds like my thinking was totally backwards, where I had thought the further away from the 4-6 degree of caster you were, the more angle there was on the drive shaft/yoke alignment. So that's why I thought it would be better if I extended the arms some.

Originally Posted by Rednroll
I was just worried that maybe with the caster where it is, if it might eventually cause front drive-shaft or any other problems where I could benefit by extending the length of the lower control arms a tad to put the caster closer to that 4-6 deg area.
See my thinking was backwards from what you outlined?

Last edited by Rednroll; 08-02-2016 at 01:50 PM.


Quick Reply: Post lift allignment



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 AM.