Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Regearing Math - What am I missing?

Old 06-04-2017, 07:01 AM
  #1  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
Skippman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,680
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Regearing Math - What am I missing?

I have a 2015 JKU Rubicon that came from the factory with 3.73 gears. From what I've read the way to calculate the needed gear ratio when upgrading tires is as follows.

New Tire Height x Current Gear Ratio / Previous Tire Height.

If that's correct then my math is as follows.

34.4 x 3.73 / 32.1 = 3.99

The closest I can find to a 3.99 would be 4.10's. Yet everyone I read about either winds up with 4.56's or 4.88's. Am I doing my math wrong? Or is there some intangible I'm not quite grasping?
Old 06-04-2017, 07:20 AM
  #2  
JK Freak
 
4x4chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: La Quinta California
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have never heard of this calculation before. Not saying it does not work, just never heard of it before. Search for "2012+" gearing chart and you will see a graph that will show you the ideal gearing for your tire size. 4:10 will work but 4:56 will be much better.
Old 06-04-2017, 07:43 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator

 
jedg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bunnlevel, NC
Posts: 3,068
Received 114 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

http://www.4lo.com/calc/gearratio.php

This has the correct calculations.
Old 06-04-2017, 07:59 AM
  #4  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
Skippman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,680
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4x4chick
I have never heard of this calculation before. Not saying it does not work, just never heard of it before. Search for "2012+" gearing chart and you will see a graph that will show you the ideal gearing for your tire size. 4:10 will work but 4:56 will be much better.
I've seen the chart. My original plan was to go with 4.56's. If I had started with 4.10's I think the math would work great on that.

34.4 x 4.10 / 32.1 = 4.39

At 4.39 the closest ratio the Dana 44 accepts would be 4.56 unless I'm mistaken.
Old 06-04-2017, 09:56 AM
  #5  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
resharp001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Willow Park, TX
Posts: 10,538
Received 1,816 Likes on 1,586 Posts
Default

Too much math for me....LOL. Fortunately there are only a few gearsets to choose from, and it's all going to depend on the tires your running. Most with 35s and the 3.6L end up at 4.56........unless you think there is a chance that you're going to go to a 37 or wheel really aggressively. If you currently have 3.73s, going to 4.10s isn't going to be a fart in the wind difference. You really need to jump 2 spots to make the cost outlay worthwhile, which would mean going to 4.56. It sounds like 4.88s are going to be too aggressive for you, making the decision a whole lot easier.

Just my opinion.
Old 06-04-2017, 10:06 AM
  #6  
JK Super Freak
 
zstairlessone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Your formula keeps RPM the same for road speed, (step 1). Why people would choose a 4.56 instead is to overcome the increased rotational mass of the larger tires (need more torque to get them spinning).
Old 06-04-2017, 10:16 AM
  #7  
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
 
Skippman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,680
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zstairlessone
Your formula keeps RPM the same for road speed, (step 1). Why people would choose a 4.56 instead is to overcome the increased rotational mass of the larger tires (need more torque to get them spinning).
And THERE's the bit I was missing. I figured it was some such, but assumptions have come back to bite me before. So people go for the shorter gearing to overcome the increased rotational mass of the heavier tires by moving the engine back into the better part of the power band. Makes complete sense.

4.56's it is. I'm not a heavy wheeler nor do I want 37's so I can just ignore the 4.88's and go with the higher MPG (on 35's) of the 4.56's. Thanks gang!
Old 06-04-2017, 10:16 AM
  #8  
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
TheDirtman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest Reno, NV
Posts: 6,222
Received 363 Likes on 289 Posts
Default

4.10 use to be the standard gear size for the Rubicon, jeep dropped it to 3.73 and reduced off road performance to gain a mpg or two. There are different levels of performance and what you are going to get out of a gear set. If you are climbing boulders and steeps then you want lower gearing, if you are driving fire roads and dirt trails or running faster thru the desert then you may want a higher gear.
Old 06-04-2017, 10:14 PM
  #9  
JK Super Freak
 
shabbernigdo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: missouri
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

35 x12.50. i went with 4.56 because i wanted the stockish Rubi feel back and i dont do any real crawling.
Old 06-17-2017, 01:38 PM
  #10  
JK Enthusiast
 
bryanwithawhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York, Long Island
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Skippman
I have a 2015 JKU Rubicon that came from the factory with 3.73 gears. From what I've read the way to calculate the needed gear ratio when upgrading tires is as follows.

New Tire Height x Current Gear Ratio / Previous Tire Height.

If that's correct then my math is as follows.

34.4 x 3.73 / 32.1 = 3.99

The closest I can find to a 3.99 would be 4.10's. Yet everyone I read about either winds up with 4.56's or 4.88's. Am I doing my math wrong? Or is there some intangible I'm not quite grasping?
I'd rather use this:

34.4/32.1=7.2% increase
3.73*1.072=3.99

So realistically, your calculation is totally correct, just harder to understand why.

I would go with 4.10s or leave it alone

Quick Reply: Regearing Math - What am I missing?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 AM.