Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

some math re. lifts and tires

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-19-2007, 08:53 PM
  #1  
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
 
broom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default some math re. lifts and tires

Stock Rubicons come with 32 inch tires. Putting on 33's would actually only cause the tire to come 1/2 inch closer to the fenders. You have to think about the distance from the axle (tire radius), not the distance across the entire tire (tire diameter). with 32 inch tires, there is 16 inches from center of axle to the edge of the tire. (that is 16 inches in the direction toward the fender) 33's have 16 1/2 inch radius. That would make them 1/2 inch closer to touching a fender ....Therefore, a 1/2 inch lift should fit 33's and a 1 inch lift should fit 34's, etc. Now if less wheel backspacing and wider tires cause the wheels to stick out where they would touch the fender flares instead of tucking behind, that would be an issue. Obviously, extended bump stops would be needed, but by my calculations, a 3 inch lift should clear 38 inch tires.
Anyone find an error in this math? It goes against what the manufacturers of the lifts are recommending. (2 inch lift for 33's, 3 inch for 35's, etc.)
Old 03-19-2007, 09:05 PM
  #2  
JK Newbie
 
duffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, your math is correct. But when applied in the real world you get rubbing with those numbers.
Old 03-19-2007, 10:18 PM
  #3  
JK Jedi
 
Rubimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Heck, 35's fit with no lift. Just make sure you only go straight and don't hit any bumps!
Old 03-19-2007, 11:34 PM
  #4  
JK Super Freak
 
mmccurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've wondered about this too, and I think the answer is that your suspension does not move perfectly up and down along the plane of the hub.

It seems to me that most 35" tires are quite a bit wider than the stock 32's (mine are 13.5" wide). Now picture what happens when just one corner is under compression -- the axle will flex up so it's at an angle to the road surface (one wheel higher than the other). So if you have a wider tread by several inches, the very outside edge of the tread will be poking up farther into the fender well than it would have with the stock-width tires.

I'm guessing that lift manufacturers want to be pretty conservative when they "guarantee" that a kit will clear a particular tire size, so they probably assume the worst case. I'm guessing that if you went for very narrow 35's, you would only need about 1.5" of lift, but definitely don't quote me on that. I have never tried this.
Old 03-20-2007, 02:51 AM
  #5  
JK Junkie
 
Renegade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by broom
... but by my calculations, a 3 inch lift should clear 38 inch tires.
Anyone find an error in this math? It goes against what the manufacturers of the lifts are recommending. (2 inch lift for 33's, 3 inch for 35's, etc.)
The math may be OK, but the application of the mathematics to suspension travel is not. Sorry.
Old 03-20-2007, 03:09 AM
  #6  
TEV
JK Freak
 
TEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Humble TX
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the problem is that your only thinking vertically. While you may move the suspension up a 1/2 inch the tire will expand in every direction, you have to think about clearance on the sides of the tires as well as the top.
Old 03-20-2007, 02:38 PM
  #7  
JK Junkie
 
CLACKEY(_!_)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Highland, Utah
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by broom
Stock Rubicons come with 32 inch tires. Putting on 33's would actually only cause the tire to come 1/2 inch closer to the fenders. You have to think about the distance from the axle (tire radius), not the distance across the entire tire (tire diameter). with 32 inch tires, there is 16 inches from center of axle to the edge of the tire. (that is 16 inches in the direction toward the fender) 33's have 16 1/2 inch radius. That would make them 1/2 inch closer to touching a fender ....Therefore, a 1/2 inch lift should fit 33's and a 1 inch lift should fit 34's, etc. Now if less wheel backspacing and wider tires cause the wheels to stick out where they would touch the fender flares instead of tucking behind, that would be an issue. Obviously, extended bump stops would be needed, but by my calculations, a 3 inch lift should clear 38 inch tires.
Anyone find an error in this math? It goes against what the manufacturers of the lifts are recommending. (2 inch lift for 33's, 3 inch for 35's, etc.)

I wanna see pics of your 38's on your 3" lift LOL



Quick Reply: some math re. lifts and tires



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM.