Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Torque for Rock krawler jam nuts

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 8, 2013 | 02:41 PM
  #21  
Bonedoc's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
From: East Stroudsburg, PA
Default

What you need to realize is that the strength behind the jam nut is the tension in the threads. As long as the nut maintains that you are good.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2013 | 05:58 PM
  #22  
fredrok's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 606
Likes: 6
From: Evergreen, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Bonedoc
What you need to realize is that the strength behind the jam nut is the tension in the threads. As long as the nut maintains that you are good.
Yes and more linear pressure on the face of the nut (ie even distribution) is what you want to spread the load AND the most friction to maintain that torque on that nut which is applying the "thread tension".

The way it sits now, it's only about 25% contact out of the 100% that it should be. That's probably the difference between needing locktite and not!

I'm not sweating it (as I've already mentioned) but it is still a fact that the CA wasn't drilled and threaded square to the arm, and for best "thread tension" it should be.

Last edited by fredrok; Sep 8, 2013 at 06:06 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2013 | 06:02 PM
  #23  
j3r3myjam3s13's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
From: Fernley,NV
Default

Originally Posted by fredrok

Yes and more linear pressure on the face of the nut (ie even distribution) is what you want to keep the most tension AND the most friction to maintain that torque on that nut which is applying the "thread tension".

The way it sits now, it's only about 25% contact out of the 100% that it should be. That's probably the difference between needing locktite and not!

I'm not sweating it (as I've already mentioned) but it is still a fact that the CA wasn't drilled and threaded square to the arm, and for best "thread tension" it should be.
I totally agree
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2013 | 07:34 PM
  #24  
Sunnysideup's Avatar
JK Super Freak
FJOTM Winner
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 211
From: Laurel, MT
Default

I found it worth while to have a buddy who works at a shop get permission to get the jeep up in the air. The arms above were much easier to get tourqed down this way! ....using a crows foot about 3 feet long. I used the vice to set them... then the jeep in the air to final adjust them to length. I noticed that for me the arms have never loosened in about 9 months. Not one bit. I did get them set perfect first, then a couple drops of locktight and cranked them down in postion. Not one of the 8 arms has moved...

good enough for me!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2016 | 07:37 PM
  #25  
Jeremi414's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: STL Missouri
Default

I know this thread is old. I have my LCA aligned and the jam nut snugged up really tight but not to torque. I have a brand new vise that I bolted down to my garage floor. But trying to torque the jam nut down tighter with a 25" crows foot and the controller arm slips in the vise. And I've got the vise VERY tight!! Thinking of mounting them backwards on the Jeep so I can access the jam nut easily and torquing the jam nut down that way. Any thoughts?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 03:13 AM
  #26  
karls10jk's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 486
From: Knoxville
Default

Clock the joint opposite the direction it wants to turn (while on the vehicle). I did that and then put stupid torque on it and it ended up rotating the joint to the right spot once I let off the wrench.


The other common way that works pretty well is to stack metal between the joint and the side of the bracket where it's trying to rotate. You end up with the joint not being able to budge while you get to torquing. Watch your eyes when you let loose on the torque, the washers or scrap metal drops pretty quickly.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 03:14 AM
  #27  
kjeeper10's Avatar
JK Junkie
Vet Army

 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

How i held mine
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image-3861938746.jpg
Views:	322
Size:	205.9 KB
ID:	663703  
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 07:15 AM
  #28  
Rock Krawler Suspension's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 13
From: Albany New York
Default

Same way that kjeeper10 did his, or you can use 1 vise and a long screw driver in the opposite end have have someone hold it straight, then rotate it and do the same if it is a krawler joint to krawler joint!
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 11:04 AM
  #29  
jadmt's Avatar
JK Jedi
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 107
From: missoula,mt
Default

Originally Posted by Rock Krawler Suspension
Same way that kjeeper10 did his, or you can use 1 vise and a long screw driver in the opposite end have have someone hold it straight, then rotate it and do the same if it is a krawler joint to krawler joint!
why don't you machine a couple of flats in the tubes? seems like it would be easy and make tightening them up so much easier.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 12:47 PM
  #30  
karls10jk's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 486
From: Knoxville
Default

They've started machining flats on the newer arms. I've got a friend that just did the 2.5" max travel and another with the 3.5" x factor.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:35 AM.