Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Upgrading to 44 or 60s?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 04:37 PM
  #1  
joentuff's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: louisville
Default Upgrading to 44 or 60s?

Ok I have a x unlimited and I knew I'd upgrade axels so I didn't mind starting with something small, my question is since I know I'll be running 38 maybe bigger should I just go with 60s so I don't ever look back and wish I'd gone that big? And what companies should I look at?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 05:11 PM
  #2  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

I would suggest using the search function with the lack of information given and the fact your profile is not filled out.
Things like lift, wheeling style, budget will all come into play. If you are running a 2007-2010 JK with an automatic I would recommend not running over a 37" tire. At $15k+ for a set of axles I would want as much information as possible to make the right decision.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 05:21 PM
  #3  
big dr's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: huntington beach CA
Default

I would tell you if you are building this Jeep to wheel hard, and aren't afraid to hit the skinny pedal when needed, Go 60's. No matter how tough you build a 44,, it still has a weak pinion when geared at 5.13's, and torquing heavy tires . I personally went with the 60's because I believe in being over built and knew I would be stepping up to 38-40" tires. If you decide to go with 60's, I would recomend the 2 most used on the market, Currie or Dynatrac.

If you are not wheeling hard and just building a good looking jeep, then you will be safe with 44's and can buy some used to save the cash. Good luck!
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 05:30 PM
  #4  
joentuff's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: louisville
Default

I am coming from a 2000 F250 7.3 with 42s so I plan on building this to take the abuse I put that truck threw, I don't want to go 44s then wish I was stronger
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #5  
D3ADLY's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
I would suggest using the search function with the lack of information given and the fact your profile is not filled out.
Things like lift, wheeling style, budget will all come into play. If you are running a 2007-2010 JK with an automatic I would recommend not running over a 37" tire. At $15k+ for a set of axles I would want as much information as possible to make the right decision.

Hey Dirtman why do you say no bigger than 37's for a 2007-2010 auto? Even regardless if you're running big axel's like the 60's?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 10:40 PM
  #6  
Matthewd5's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 0
From: Auburn Maine
Default

Originally Posted by joentuff
Ok I have a x unlimited and I knew I'd upgrade axels so I didn't mind starting with something small, my question is since I know I'll be running 38 maybe bigger should I just go with 60s so I don't ever look back and wish I'd gone that big? And what companies should I look at?
It depends on how often and how hard you wheel...

in November I replaced my factory d30 and d44 with Dynatrac pro rock d44 up front and the Dynatrac d60 trail, I also regeared to 5.13 and added ARB lockers with RCV axles up front with synergy ball joints and Dynatrac axles in the rear.

its an amazing ride, it's a 4wdrive go kart, even with heavy bumpers, a fairly heavy tire carrier and a winch.

But can you justify spending somewhere between $13,000-$16,009 when your done with little stuff like new rims and tires, ARB compressor and possibly having to replace your front bumper with a stubby for more clearance?

Reply
Old Jan 29, 2014 | 05:50 AM
  #7  
Tooadvanced's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
From: West Richland Washington
Default

Originally Posted by D3ADLY

Hey Dirtman why do you say no bigger than 37's for a 2007-2010 auto? Even regardless if you're running big axel's like the 60's?
Mostly cause the auto will spill its guts with a tire bigger than that
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2014 | 06:53 AM
  #8  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

Originally Posted by D3ADLY
Hey Dirtman why do you say no bigger than 37's for a 2007-2010 auto? Even regardless if you're running big axel's like the 60's?
The 3.8 and the shitty gearing in the 4 speed auto does not realisticly provide enough power to turn tires bigger then 37".
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2014 | 07:54 AM
  #9  
dr.dirty's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Victorville Ca
Default

I have seen plenty auto JKS running 40s reliably for years. Is it a shitty tranny yup sure is but if geared properly you should have no issues.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2014 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

Oh, you can run 40's on a JK auto but the performance is terriable on the road even with 5.38 gears. If it were a dedicated trail rig running at least the rubicon transfer case off road it would be alright. A 5.0 atlas would be more optimal for it as well. Adding the extra weight of tons on an already heavy JKU makes things even worse with the low power output of the 3.8 motor.

You will be putting extra stress on the drivetrain and over time you will see issues.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 AM.