Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

1310 driveshafts??

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #1  
bneu's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default 1310 driveshafts??

What are the advantages and disadvantages, if any? between the 1310 OE replacement driveshafts that bolt up to the stock flanges. and the 1310 driveshafts that utilize replacement transfer case and pinion yokes?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #2  
IGOFSHN's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 1
From: Lemoore, CA
Default

If you use the ones that bolt to the stock flange, you can use the stock shafts as spares.
some people will say you should get the 1350's but the 1310's are plenty strong.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 12:01 AM
  #3  
bneu's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

my question then, is why is there an option to replace the stock transfer case and pinion yokes?? does it allow for the use of a slightly songer driveshaft? Does anyone know??
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 12:41 AM
  #4  
jslamerman's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Yes, by replacing the tcase/pinion yolks you get a longer dshaft, and possibly a part that is easier to replace if you damage it on the trail. You can always keep the factory flanges in the Jeep along with the stock shafts for spares. Its a little bit of a pain to break the pinion nut, and there are some backwoods tequniques for reapplying the correct torque so as not to mess with the pinion crush sleeve (not correct by any means, but Ive seen them work time and time again with no issues at all) that is intended as a one time torque item. I dont believe youll see any advantage to a 2" longer shaft though, unless you are a 2 door (Id want every small advantage I could get, Ive got one too!!)
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 02:04 AM
  #5  
bneu's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Just to clear things up then. Are the aftermarket yokes shorter than the stalk ones, thus allowing a slightly longer driveshaft? resulting in slightly less angle on the CV joint.

Also, is the pinion flang and pinion yoke just two names for the same thing?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 02:25 AM
  #6  
jslamerman's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bneu
Just to clear things up then. Are the aftermarket yokes shorter than the stalk ones, thus allowing a slightly longer driveshaft? resulting in slightly less angle on the CV joint.

Also, is the pinion flang and pinion yoke just two names for the same thing?
Yes, but again, but do not equate this to having the same effect as an SYE. The difference is minimal. I would hardly worry about this with a 4 dr. Slightly less, by about a degree maybe (if that). A flange would have bolt holes, allowing another cast piece with bolt holes to bolt to it that actually houses the ujoint. A pinion yolk would attach to the dshaft via two of the ujoint caps, the other falh of these two caps being encased on the driveshaft cast piece, and the driveshaft itself would completely house the other two halves.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 03:03 AM
  #7  
bneu's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Ok. Now I have a 2 door rubicon and a 4.5" RE long arm kit. what drive line parts would you replace, and why?( driveshafts 1310 1350? yokes, flanges) price at this point is not an object. I want it to be as functional as possable.

I would appreciate your advice, thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 05:22 AM
  #8  
BLKRuby's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Chelsea, MI
Default

JE REEL 1350 no doubt.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 06:03 AM
  #9  
Renegade's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 1
From: Chattanooga, TN
Default

Tom Wood offers some analysis of these questions on his website. I read it yesterday and found it very interesting.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 07:25 AM
  #10  
DirkDigler's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jslamerman
Yes, by replacing the tcase/pinion yolks you get a longer dshaft, and possibly a part that is easier to replace if you damage it on the trail. You can always keep the factory flanges in the Jeep along with the stock shafts for spares. Its a little bit of a pain to break the pinion nut, and there are some backwoods tequniques for reapplying the correct torque so as not to mess with the pinion crush sleeve (not correct by any means, but Ive seen them work time and time again with no issues at all) that is intended as a one time torque item. I dont believe youll see any advantage to a 2" longer shaft though, unless you are a 2 door (Id want every small advantage I could get, Ive got one too!!)
Yes.....The pinion nut is torqued to 200lbs from the factory and difficult to remove.
It is only necessary to crank it down to 150lbs when reinstalling it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 PM.