Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

33" v 35" tires

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #1  
cyberil's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Herts. UK
Default 33" v 35" tires

Just ordered a 2012 JK Sahara Black on Friday.

I live in the UK and I've been trying to decide on tire sizes for the last week or so. I prefer the look of the 35" tires but here's the dilemma:

The Jeep is a daily drive
We're not used to big wheeled Jeeps and trucks here so they can look out of place
Realistically it won't be taken off-road much

Also, for anyone that has them what's it like riding on BF Goodrich Mud Terrain tires in the wet and dry compared to all terrains?

Was going to have my stock rims powder coated matt black - what width tire will I need?



Paul
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 10:20 AM
  #2  
CreepJeep's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
Default

33's are perfect for a DD.
especially if you are not gonna be off-road a lot.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 10:22 AM
  #3  
JK10's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Default

I went right for 35's when I got mine. It is my daily driver and I don't mind them at all. Yes, your gas mileage is gonna go down, more road noise, etc. But I personally think 33's look too small on JK's.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #4  
Rick in Colorado's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Evergreen, CO
Default

Originally Posted by cyberil
Just ordered a 2012 JK Sahara Black on Friday.

I live in the UK and I've been trying to decide on tire sizes for the last week or so. I prefer the look of the 35" tires but here's the dilemma:

The Jeep is a daily drive
We're not used to big wheeled Jeeps and trucks here so they can look out of place
Realistically it won't be taken off-road much

Also, for anyone that has them what's it like riding on BF Goodrich Mud Terrain tires in the wet and dry compared to all terrains?

Was going to have my stock rims powder coated matt black - what width tire will I need?



Paul
2-dr or 4-dr? I have a 2012 2-dr with 35s and, they look beefy, but 33s would have looked good as well. In my opinion, the 2-dr can carry a smaller tire better than a 4-dr can. In other words, 33s on a 2-dr are the same as 35s on a 4-dr.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
Canyonrunner's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by cyberil
Just ordered a 2012 JK Sahara Black on Friday.

I live in the UK and I've been trying to decide on tire sizes for the last week or so. I prefer the look of the 35" tires but here's the dilemma:

The Jeep is a daily drive
We're not used to big wheeled Jeeps and trucks here so they can look out of place
Realistically it won't be taken off-road much

Also, for anyone that has them what's it like riding on BF Goodrich Mud Terrain tires in the wet and dry compared to all terrains?

Was going to have my stock rims powder coated matt black - what width tire will I need?



Paul
Congrats on your new Jeep. Considering the above... you most likely would be perfectly happy with 33's, especially considering the cost of petrol for a DD. Also, without at least a moderate lift 35's will rub if you plan on doing any serious off-roading. My neighbor has a JKU with 33" BFG's KM2's 285/70/17 and no lift. His Jeep looks aggressive (cool). He only wheels easy to moderate trails. He removed his front air dam and his tires clear no problem. My personal experience is that BFG All Terrains perform better on wet pavement than the muds. They are also quieter and offer a smoother ride.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #6  
Wandell's Avatar
JK Freak
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 868
Likes: 8
From: Cairo, GA
Default

33's and 35's both look great. But you have to look at the effect on performance and cost. I have 33's on my JKU with an auto tranny and 3.73 gears. I can't imagine how bad performace would be with 35's. Regearing would be a must. I understand you have a 2012 with more power so it may not be as bad as my 2011.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 11:09 AM
  #7  
cyberil's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Herts. UK
Default

Originally Posted by Rick in Colorado
2-dr or 4-dr? I have a 2012 2-dr with 35s and, they look beefy, but 33s would have looked good as well. In my opinion, the 2-dr can carry a smaller tire better than a 4-dr can. In other words, 33s on a 2-dr are the same as 35s on a 4-dr.
Rick

It's a 2 door. What you wrote made a lot of sense - I hadn't thought of it like that.

I've just measured up my LR2 which has small wheels and comparing the size - the wrangler is massive in comparison. I'll be adding a lift, Is 2" best with 33's. Also does anyone know the size in inches of the stock tire?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 11:13 AM
  #8  
cyberil's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Herts. UK
Default

Originally Posted by Wandell
33's and 35's both look great. But you have to look at the effect on performance and cost. I have 33's on my JKU with an auto tranny and 3.73 gears. I can't imagine how bad performace would be with 35's. Regearing would be a must. I understand you have a 2012 with more power so it may not be as bad as my 2011.
Actually, I'll be running auto on a 2.8 diesel engine - that's one advantage of living this side of the pond. However, the cost of fuel is crazy
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #9  
cyberil's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Herts. UK
Default

Originally Posted by Canyonrunner
Congrats on your new Jeep. Considering the above... you most likely would be perfectly happy with 33's, especially considering the cost of petrol for a DD. Also, without at least a moderate lift 35's will rub if you plan on doing any serious off-roading. My neighbor has a JKU with 33" BFG's KM2's 285/70/17 and no lift. His Jeep looks aggressive (cool). He only wheels easy to moderate trails. He removed his front air dam and his tires clear no problem. My personal experience is that BFG All Terrains perform better on wet pavement than the muds. They are also quieter and offer a smoother ride.
I was going to add a 2" lift, but hadn't considered not adding one.

Does anyone have a pic of a 2 door JK with 33" tires and no lift and one with a 2" lift so I can compare?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #10  
Tight_wad's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default

There are also tires that are in the 34 inch class. So you could do something between them. It's really is up to you. The real question is, will you have regrets when you see someome that has 35's on theirs and you don't? Also, in the UK, what is the laws for tires there? Can the stick out past the fenders, or do they have to be completely covered?

33's covered no problem, even with spacers.
34's like mine listed at bottom, 1.5 inches not covered with stock wheels and spacers.
35's will be pushing about 2-3 inches not covered with stock wheels and spacers.

My wife did comment the other day that my tires now look a little small, not that I will be changing them. But then again, she did open the door to that idea.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 PM.