Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

RC 3.5 Series II Suspension vs RC 3.75 Combo

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 03:44 PM
  #1  
MG2013's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default RC 3.5 Series II Suspension vs RC 3.75 Combo

I've pretty much narrowed my choices down to these two lifts. I just dont see any reason to spend more on a Teraflex lift when nobody has anything but great things to say about Rough Country Lifts and their outstanding Customer Service. I'll be using it primarily as a DD with some moderate mud, trail, and some sand by the river. Which one do ya'll think is the better deal? Will the 3.5 inch lift need drive shaft mods? If so which ones? The price and size difference between the two is negligible, but which lift would be better for my use. I understand the body lift doesn't look wonderful to some people, but the gap doesn't bother me too much. At least a rear bumper lift is included to hide the space between the body and bumper. What are ya'lls opinions? Which do ya'll think will have the best ride? Thanks guys
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 03:56 PM
  #2  
SB2008's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: NW JERSEY
Default

My vote is for the 3.5 series II, I'm happy with mine. Depending on how much you wheel a new front driveshaft may eventually be in order. Make sure you give the guys at R/C a call and let them know your a forum member and they will do better on the price!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #3  
MG2013's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by SB2008
My vote is for the 3.5 series II, I'm happy with mine. Depending on how much you wheel a new front driveshaft may eventually be in order. Make sure you give the guys at R/C a call and let them know your a forum member and they will do better on the price!
Did you end up having to buy a new driveshaft? And is it both front and rear or just the front drive shaft?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #4  
greensouth's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee , Fl
Default

I have put 19k on mine since I installed the same 3.5" RC lift kit with no problems. It's mostly just a dd but rides great.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 04:50 PM
  #5  
MG2013's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by greensouth
I have put 19k on mine since I installed the same 3.5" RC lift kit with no problems. It's mostly just a dd but rides great.
Stock Drive Shafts?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 04:55 PM
  #6  
kesmith8's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Tallassee, AL
Default

Originally Posted by MG2013
I've pretty much narrowed my choices down to these two lifts. I just dont see any reason to spend more on a Teraflex lift when nobody has anything but great things to say about Rough Country Lifts and their outstanding Customer Service. I'll be using it primarily as a DD with some moderate mud, trail, and some sand by the river. Which one do ya'll think is the better deal? Will the 3.5 inch lift need drive shaft mods? If so which ones? The price and size difference between the two is negligible, but which lift would be better for my use. I understand the body lift doesn't look wonderful to some people, but the gap doesn't bother me too much. At least a rear bumper lift is included to hide the space between the body and bumper. What are ya'lls opinions? Which do ya'll think will have the best ride? Thanks guys

My vote is for 3.5 II. I am really happy with mine as well. No problems to mention. Installed last Jan. Only about 4,000 miles on current setup, but no issues. Cheers
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 05:06 PM
  #7  
MG2013's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by kesmith8
My vote is for 3.5 II. I am really happy with mine as well. No problems to mention. Installed last Jan. Only about 4,000 miles on current setup, but no issues. Cheers
So basically if I dont disco i shouldnt worry about the driveshafts? Or at least just take it easy?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 05:42 AM
  #8  
MG2013's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default

The general consensus is 3.5 over the combo, but can some one help me with my question concerning drive shaft issues?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 06:14 AM
  #9  
bo9roadking's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MG2013
The general consensus is 3.5 over the combo, but can some one help me with my question concerning drive shaft issues?
I've read on the forums that if you put a 27.5" or longer shock on a 2012 Jeep, you will need a new driveshaft. From personal experience, I have a 3.5" RK xfactor mid arm suspension installed and I needed an aftermarket driveshaft because the stock driveshaft hit the crossover exhaust pipe and had such a steep angle at the transfer case that the CV boot was pinched. I bought a Coast driveshaft that barely cleared the crossover exhaust pipe. I ended up moving the crossover pipe anyways because the Coast driveshaft clearance was about 1/4" at full droop.

Last edited by bo9roadking; Nov 29, 2011 at 06:17 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
ChryslerChris's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

3.5 is awesome. It's on mine and I love how it rides and wheels. Put in Tom Woods driveshafts just to avoid stock ds issues right off the bat
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:51 AM.