Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Philosophical Question about Tire Carrier spacers

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 22, 2012 | 08:38 PM
  #1  
powrsurg's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 988
Likes: 2
From: Middle Island, NY
Default Philosophical Question about Tire Carrier spacers

I just purchased and installed the Rugged Ridge Tire Carrier Spacer. Im impressed with weight of this thing. None the less all threads on this site indicate that when moving to 35in tires the spare on the back needs to be raised up and pushed out. After installing according to the directions, I noticed that the tire more than clears the bumper. So much so, where I can reverse the Spacer so that its down and out.

Philosophical Question:
If I were to reposition the spacer so the tire sits down and out, would I in effect reduce the stress on the stock tire carrier? My thought is that the majority of the spares weight would be below the center point of the tire carrier. Installed correctly, the tire is above the center point of the tire carrier. WOuld positioning this spacer down and out reduce any stress?

Note:
Im eventually going to replace all the bumpers so im using the spacer as a short term solution.

Click image for larger version

Name:	114723-md.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	7.8 KB
ID:	332717
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 08:09 AM
  #2  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

With a 35 on there, you would be on the bumper if you reversed the bracket. And it would have no effect on damage to the stock carrier. Weight is weight, and that is the issue
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 08:48 AM
  #3  
powrsurg's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 988
Likes: 2
From: Middle Island, NY
Default

I already made the switch. Down and out it misses the bumper by a quarter of an inch. My question is for the engineers here. Would it be better to have the weight below the center point of the carrier or above?
Originally Posted by Ryan0260
With a 35 on there, you would be on the bumper if you reversed the bracket. And it would have no effect on damage to the stock carrier. Weight is weight, and that is the issue
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
JKRIDER07's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
Default

I wore out my rear hinges with a 33" tire so watch out for that. A 35" tires is a lot heavier that a stock wheel.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 09:43 AM
  #5  
1978cj7jk2012's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 1
From: Pawnee Ok
Default

Theoretically it is still attached to the same stress points. Even though the stress is applied in different directions it is still the same amount of force being applied. With that being said, if your tailgate is going to give, it will give at one of the points not matter what direction. (that is based on assuming the stress points are all equal, I didn't design the tailgate so I don't know if top points are stronger than bottom ect.) just my .02. Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 10:05 AM
  #6  
FlameRedJK's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 4
From: Riverside, Ca
Default

35" MTR on stock carrier with no spacer and no issues, just barely fits.

Click image for larger version

Name:	image-4078618738.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	58.2 KB
ID:	332861

It appears to rest on the bumper but does not...there is the ever so slightest gap between the two.
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-168082025.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	40.6 KB
ID:	332862
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 10:44 AM
  #7  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by powrsurg
I already made the switch. Down and out it misses the bumper by a quarter of an inch. My question is for the engineers here. Would it be better to have the weight below the center point of the carrier or above?
It doesn't take an engineer to figure out that weight is weight. The direction of the spacer will have no effect on the end result. Fyi I have had my 35 my stock rear carrier for 2 years on a spacer with no issues or rattles. I would bolt it on normally and run with it until you get a better carrier. This is my plan at least. You may even get lucky and never have an issue with what you have now
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 PM.