Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Tire weight and MPGs

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 12:36 PM
  #1  
Bootscraper's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Da Swamp, LA
Default Tire weight and MPGs

I have some Nitto Trail Grapplers (2000 miles) on my 2012 JKU now and getting horrible mileage, 15.5-16 hwy. One tire alone weighs 72 lbs. The Terra Grapplers (same size, 285-65-18) weigh in at 52. Could it be justifiable to sell the trail grapplers for a lighter tire? How much difference would a negative 80lbs of un-sprung weight make. They look awesome but the JK will probably see very little trail time. Thanks for the help fellas.

Last edited by Bootscraper; Aug 4, 2012 at 12:50 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
4W-Jive's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

Rotational intertia is over 3x more detrimental as static inertia (at the given radius). Pulling 80 lbs of rotational inertia up to 50 mph or whatever speed, is similar to adding roughly 300 lbs to your vehicle during acceleration, so it will effect city driving more than hwy given this. You also have more rolling resistance that has to be overcome constantly. AND more leverage which could hurt depending on what gears you have.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #3  
matprovo's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Humble, Texas
Default

Do you have a pro cal? I like my Nitto Trail Grapplers (35s) and get between 16-17 depending on how I drive during the week. I've found once I break 70mph the mpg suffers tremendously.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 01:19 PM
  #4  
Bootscraper's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Da Swamp, LA
Default

3.73 in the pumpkins. Might try to keep around 65 next trip. Who buys a Jeep for the mileage anyway?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 01:28 PM
  #5  
wayoflife's Avatar
JK-Forum Founder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 16
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 4W-Jive
Rotational intertia is over 3x more detrimental as static inertia (at the given radius). Pulling 80 lbs of rotational inertia up to 50 mph or whatever speed, is similar to adding roughly 300 lbs to your vehicle during acceleration, so it will effect city driving more than hwy given this. You also have more rolling resistance that has to be overcome constantly. AND more leverage which could hurt depending on what gears you have.
what he said. rolling resistance will do more to hurt your mpg than slightly heavier tires.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 02:02 PM
  #6  
TheTerminator's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by Bootscraper
I have some Nitto Trail Grapplers (2000 miles) on my 2012 JKU now and getting horrible mileage, 15.5-16 hwy. One tire alone weighs 72 lbs. The Terra Grapplers (same size, 285-65-18) weigh in at 52. Could it be justifiable to sell the trail grapplers for a lighter tire? How much difference would a negative 80lbs of un-sprung weight make. They look awesome but the JK will probably see very little trail time. Thanks for the help fellas.
Are you running with OD on? If yes, turn if off. You should gain a couple MPGs. I get around 18.3 hwy, driving at 60mph with cruise control, 35s Goodyear MTR/K. I also have a Superchips running 87 tune, but I doubt it does much other than set the tire size.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.