Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Wrangler JK 3.6l easy 20HP gain?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 12:46 PM
  #1  
Jeep573's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Oman
Default Wrangler JK 3.6l easy 20HP gain?

Hey all, i looked up the internet to know why is the jeep only 285hp & the charger and ram are 305hp though they all have the same 3.6l engine, the only different I found is that the charger and ram has a true-dual exhaust and the jeep has a Y-pipe that connects 2 pipes to make them one which means they have a better air flow.(maybe they have a different tune, but Ive got a bullydog tuner anyway) **if anyone knows another difference please reply**
I attached a picture of my idea, I want to do a custom exhaust as shown (The orange lines are the OEM joints & ignore pipes size they'll all be 2.5 oe 3 inches). As I know the X-pipe will make it sound better and will give a small hp gain so i thought of putting it. And the mufflers away from each other because there is no space for 2 next to each other.
the only thing that make me hesitate is the different length of pipes on the 2 sides (from engine to xipipe) and (x-pipe to mufflers).
what do you guys think about it? should I do it? any comments about it? would you recommend 2.5 or 3 inches?
Thanks in advance!
I apologize if my English is not that good, its not my first language
Click image for larger version

Name:	20141110_005735.jpg
Views:	1717
Size:	18.6 KB
ID:	583636
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 01:23 PM
  #2  
GJeep's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 4
From: Israel
Default

Originally Posted by Jeep573
Hey all, i looked up the internet to know why is the jeep only 285hp & the charger and ram are 305hp though they all have the same 3.6l engine, the only different I found is that the charger and ram has a true-dual exhaust and the jeep has a Y-pipe that connects 2 pipes to make them one which means they have a better air flow.(maybe they have a different tune, but Ive got a bullydog tuner anyway) **if anyone knows another difference please reply**
I attached a picture of my idea, I want to do a custom exhaust as shown (The orange lines are the OEM joints & ignore pipes size they'll all be 2.5 oe 3 inches). As I know the X-pipe will make it sound better and will give a small hp gain so i thought of putting it. And the mufflers away from each other because there is no space for 2 next to each other.
the only thing that make me hesitate is the different length of pipes on the 2 sides (from engine to xipipe) and (x-pipe to mufflers).
what do you guys think about it? should I do it? any comments about it? would you recommend 2.5 or 3 inches?
Thanks in advance!
I apologize if my English is not that good, its not my first language
Attachment 583636
An exhaust is tuned for a specific engine. In this case, there's more than one exhaust for the engine, but they are tuned to give specific b.h.p. and torque curves.
It takes an engineer and experimentation to design an exhaust.

Making an exhaust "by feel" is a gamble, and there's good chance that you'll end up with worse performance than the stock exhaust.
Even if you do get some more b.h.p., you don't know where, along the r.p.m., you will get it -- low, mid or high r.p.m. . There may be more power at certain r.p.m., and less power at another r.p.m. .

The 2 pipes should make the engine 'see' the same resistance, that's why they are usually of the same length.
The left pipe on the Wrangler has a loop, for balancing the longer right pipe.
In your drawing, one pipe is not only longer, it has one more bend. Each bend creates resistance to gas flow, so overall it is like you made the pipe even longer.

For getting more b.h.p., flow is typically improved at both ends, at the intake manifold too.

BTW, the 3.6L works better with 2.5" than with 3" pipe.

Last edited by GJeep; Nov 10, 2014 at 12:17 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 09:39 AM
  #3  
Jeep573's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Oman
Default

Originally Posted by GJeep
An exhaust is tuned for a specific engine. In this case, there's more than one exhaust for the engine, but they are tuned to give specific b.h.p. and torque curves.
It takes an engineer and experimentation to design an exhaust.

Making an exhaust "by feel" is a gamble, and there's good chance that you'll end up with worse performance than the stock exhaust.
Even if you do get some more b.h.p., you don't know where, along the r.p.m., you will get it -- low, mid or high r.p.m. . There may be more power at certain r.p.m., and less power at another r.p.m. .

The 2 pipes should make the engine 'see' the same resistance, that's why they are usually of the same length.
The left pipe on the Wrangler has a loop, for balancing the longer right pipe.
In your drawing, one pipe is not only longer, it has one more bend. Each bend creates resistance to gas flow, so overall it is like you made the pipe even longer.

For getting more b.h.p., flow is typically improved at both ends, at the intake manifold too.

BTW, the 3.6L works better with 2.5" than with 3" pipe.
Actually few of my friends have no cat-back, they only run with the stock muffler before the cat-back, or exchanging the muffler, and theyre having great performance results and a great sound, but the exchanged muffler has better performance, i took the idea from them, but with adding the x-pipe and another muffler.
Thanks for the info that 2.5" is better than 3", but if you watched closely, the joint is after the loop, so resistance will still be same, except for the distance from x-pipe to mufflers will be different, except if make 2 long pipes to the cat-back area and put 2 mufflers down there.
if you are talking about "specific b.h.p. and torque curves", with my friends' performance difference i'd definitely go with this setup, other than that, is there any other issue?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 10:07 AM
  #4  
pjmjk's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: new haven, CT
Default

Curious to see what ya end up doing. Looks like a cool idea though.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 10:39 AM
  #5  
Ncb's Avatar
Ncb
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 2
From: Parker, Colorado
Default

With my 20 plus years experience as a mechanic I don't think you'll get 20 HP from it. Exhaust kits or custom designs on naturally aspirated engines usually yield single digit HP gains. You're adding more weight and a complicated system. Not trying to be a negative Nancy. Not worth the time or money in my opinion.

Dyno the Jeep before and after and prove me wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 12:04 PM
  #6  
Timbeaux's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

I'd lay odds that it is in the programming. I'd imagine the tune in the jeep is more drivable in that application @ 285hp than 305 or whatever in the Charger.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 12:27 PM
  #7  
Jeep573's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Oman
Default

Originally Posted by Ncb
With my 20 plus years experience as a mechanic I don't think you'll get 20 HP from it. Exhaust kits or custom designs on naturally aspirated engines usually yield single digit HP gains. You're adding more weight and a complicated system. Not trying to be a negative Nancy. Not worth the time or money in my opinion.

Dyno the Jeep before and after and prove me wrong.

Unfortunately we have no dynos in my area or i would definitely dyno it! with your 20 years+ experience, tell me what do you else think is the difference between charger&ram and jeep? why is there a 20hp difference?
Im considering non carb compliant magnaflow universal cats, they'll let all the carb out, opposite of what my corsa is doing, i can smell all the carb coming out if i hit down the pedal, the carb-free engine will run better i guess?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
Jeep573's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Oman
Default

Originally Posted by pjmjk
Curious to see what ya end up doing. Looks like a cool idea though.
Thanks bud! ill post it once i do it ( IF i did! ) im a bit hesitant about it!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #9  
14Sport's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 8
From: The Dirty South
Default

Originally Posted by Timbeaux
I'd lay odds that it is in the programming. I'd imagine the tune in the jeep is more drivable in that application @ 285hp than 305 or whatever in the Charger.
^^^x2. Especially considering Wranglers can be up to 1,000 pounds heavier.

Doesn't the performance tune on aftermarket programmers increase HP?

Last edited by 14Sport; Nov 10, 2014 at 12:33 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 12:38 PM
  #10  
Jeep573's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Oman
Default

Originally Posted by Timbeaux
I'd lay odds that it is in the programming. I'd imagine the tune in the jeep is more drivable in that application @ 285hp than 305 or whatever in the Charger.
well, i got a CAI, a cat-back & bullydog tuner & a stock charger would still be faster that my jeep!
it may be the programming, but there is definitely something else!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:34 AM.