Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Unlimited X front axle components broke twice..weak!!

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #1  
juicemanjk05's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Edwards,co
Angry Unlimited X front axle components broke twice..weak!!

I have broke 2 axle shafts, 8 spider gears, 1 differential,pinions , 1 axle housing and a few bearings!!! This is because i tryed to 4wheel with 4:10's and 35in tires!!! Weak! of course they would not cover the damage the second time so i said forget it!!! So I just had the dealer put in the rubicon dana 44 with locker and switch pod ...the difference in cost was only $600 so now i have a front dana 44 with locker!!! still less expensive then buying a Rubi so now i have to figure out what
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #2  
mkjeep's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 4
From: Hammond Louisiana
Default

What was your total cost on having this done by your dealer?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #3  
duneslider's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Riverton, Utah
Default

Its been a weak axle since it came out in the YJ 20 years ago. Just never was made to be used with big tires.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #4  
bahadden's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: eastern north carolina
Default

ive always been told 33 if you are going to push it and it still might break, after the second time breaking i would have upgraded
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 08:11 PM
  #5  
mkjeep's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 15,665
Likes: 4
From: Hammond Louisiana
Default

Aww Hell , forget it ! I'm just gonna save up for D-60's. Although I've been eyeing my dad's not in use dump truck axles for a while now. Only prob is that they're still on the trucks he's trying to sell.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 03:43 AM
  #6  
Renegade's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 1
From: Chattanooga, TN
Default

Originally Posted by duneslider
Its been a weak axle since it came out in the YJ 20 years ago. Just never was made to be used with big tires.
It goes back even farther than that. The CJ's had the D30 in the front too, only the CJ had a worse problem...the AMC 20 rear end.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 04:11 AM
  #7  
2K1TJ's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 1
From: Ga
Default

Originally Posted by Renegade
It goes back even farther than that. The CJ's had the D30 in the front too, only the CJ had a worse problem...the AMC 20 rear end.


Yep, he's right.

The AMC 20 could be made pretty stout with a few mods though. Add some 1-piece axles and weld the tubes to the pumpkin to keep them from spinning and your good. The ring gear is actually bigger than a D44.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 04:23 AM
  #8  
TEEJ's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 5
From: Lawrenceville, NJ
Talking

As the D30 has historically been OK up to 35's with reasonable go go juice input, etc....and the new D30 is supposed to be stronger than the TJ's, etc....

....I'm thinking that its quite likely that your go go juice input is more than reasonable for the conditions.



So, while the D30 is no D60, neither is the D44. You might want to consider a bit more finesse on the trails, unless the breakage is acceptable from down-time/$ perspective.



Some people break D60's too, on the gas at full lock, etc...one side catches, the other's spinning, and BANG!

Its the nature of the game.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 05:06 AM
  #9  
adaycj's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I think it is common to break a D30 on the trail with 35s. I've seen a few. I also think it is common to tweak the housing. This causes absurd things like repeated failures that are not easily traced.

Between a marginal component design for mods (big tires is one), a marginal housing for off road (and abuse), and the possibility of poor workmanship when repairs are performed ... repeated failures are common. I think this is why you see some rigs on 35 with no problems for years, and some guys that have smoked multiple units.

At least this guy admits he was 4 wheeling. Many people start their D30 post with a rant about Dana or Chrysler and then say "I was just driving along ...". It is the part after the "..." that gets left out. " I was just driving along I90" is a whole world different than "I was just driving along ramming fire hydrants".

Congrats on the upgrade, I agree that there is no sense spending big money on the D30 when you can upgrade for almost the same cash. Watch the outer u-joints on your 44, they are failure prone too. If you did kill your D30s from overuse of the skinny pedal, your D44 outers may also not live long.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 05:56 AM
  #10  
Chet's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Cassopolis, Michigan
Default

I just ordered the chromoly replacement axle shafts/ujoints for my busted front D30 - I figured it was cheaper than putting in a D44.

Any thoughts on this vs. going with the D44?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM.