Notices
Stock JK Tech Bulletin board forum regarding issues with OE (original equipment) components of the Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) such as factory suspension parts, engine, transmission, body parts, interior fixtures and the on-board computer.

Love my 3.8L

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #11  
BLK-JK23's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: st marys md
Default

3.8 is okay.

but admit it.

a 6.1 hemi with a nasty cam and off road x pipe and borla stingers EHMMM!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:34 PM
  #12  
plac's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay, CA
Default

Originally Posted by moabjk072d
It sounds like you have an AUTO (my 2007 was an Auto) and you are way under geared, I have seen way to many people on here add bigger tires lift and accessories and not regear. if you want the power you have to gear your jeep according the modifications done to it.

even if you added a lift, 33-37" tires and a wind block to a corvette you would still feel a major difference in power
exactly dude... 33's with an auto and STOCK gears?? no wonder its useless on the freeway..
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
jp4fun's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant View TN
Default

Originally Posted by thom1879
Mine can't even hold speed on the highway. If I set the cruise at 70 it will bog down on the slightest incline and slow down to 65 before it downshifts to get back up to 70 and upshift then repeat process... It did this with the stock set up as well as the set up I have now. It's annoying and IMO underpowered for even modest highway driving which most JK owners do. I don't want a sports car or need a hemi, I know its a brick but come on, at least give it enough power to hold speed on the highway.
The auto does wander a lot. This does give the perception of lackluster power. I have the stock setup with 3.73's. I feel the 4.10's would have been a better choice for the standard gear set, especially for the auto. When I go to bigger tires, I will figure my re-gear as if I started with 4.10.s.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #14  
Phantasm's Avatar
JK Freak
Vet: Army

15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 766
Likes: 3
From: Fort Benning, GA
Default

The 3.8L Beats the snot out of the 3.0L V6 in my 88 4Runner w. A/T and 4.10s and my 89 4Runner 5 speed.

I for one am a proponent of adequately powered vehicles, it keeps you from tearing up your drivetrain components. Drop a Hemi in there and see what your 4WD converter or ring and pinions look like when you stomp the pedal and the wheels are at a full turn in 4WD and grab some pavement or solid traction at all four corners. zing is all you will hear after the teeth shred off.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #15  
Shadow's_Jeep's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: Keizer,Oregon
Default

At 53 year's old ,I have driven lot's of diffrent car's & truck's. some fast , some no so fast. The 3.8L is in the middle of the group & does evreything I need it to do. Have had no problem's with it
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #16  
Bad_CRC's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: mn
Default

I like the 3.8. seems to have enough kick when it needs it.


my complaint is that sometimes when I punch the gas, nothing happens for a bit while the computer tries to figure out whether it should let me go or not. I certainly don't think it's the engine, cause I've driven enough underpowered vehicles in my life to know what happens when an engine tries and fails to deliver power, the 3.8 isn't always being told to go when you hit the gas... I don't know why.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #17  
mikegp's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Default

this is my first jeep so i can't really compare it with anything else, but i do like the engine type. it seems powerful enough for me and the mild trails i wheel on. to be honest though, i would love to have a diesel engine instead...but overall pretty happy with my 3.8.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:32 PM
  #18  
NorthRiver's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish,Wa.
Default

I'm generally pretty happy with the 3.8,the 4 spd auto could use some help though. Its pretty much a PITA.

I had my Dodge Ram serviced today and drove a Dodge Nitro for a couple hours. The Nitro had a 4.0 V6 and 5 spd auto. My JK and the Nitro are similar in size,weight,and shape. The Nitro absolutely blows the JK out of the water as far as driveability goes. The 4.0 in the Nitro does make more power,but IMO the 5spd tranny makes the biggest difference. It really was a pleasure to drive.

I think there would be far less complaints with the 3.8 if it came with a 5 spd auto.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #19  
JKRINGO's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: SPACE
Default

Gotta say that I too get annoyed with the seemingly everyday Pissing & Moaning, mostly from owners that for whatever reason just had to have an Auto tranny. Seems more than likely that a good percentage of this disgruntled bunch purchased a JK without taking a test drive, or if they did they didn't give it much thought. It's way to easy to be tempted to buy automobiles based only on looks,style,emotion,advertising,etc.etc. always has been. As for me, I don't know perhaps I just lucky but I really couldn't be happier (well there's always the Mod list). I admit that like many others I was hesitant to buy a Chrysler product but After two years and 19k on the clock I love everything about mine and yes that includes that 3.8 under the hood.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #20  
SargeW's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Fallbrook Ca
Default

My Rubi performs very well, but I am stock size tires (32") six speed and 4.10 gears, all stock. I have added a Warn winch and a Blue Ox base plate to the front so I have increased the weight up front by about 200#. A set of Rancho leveling coils up front eliminated the sag and leveled the rake. But the engine is still more than adequate for the ride. IMO increasing the tire size makes a huge difference to rolling resistance. If you want to play, you gotta pay.......
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 PM.