Notices
Jeep TJ & YJ Wrangler Overall Jeep TJ & YJ Wrangler technical discussion bulletin board forum. This includes all Jeep Wranglers made between 1987-2006 and includes models such as the Unlimited, Rubicon, Sahara, Sport and X.

TJ rubicon vs a regular LJ

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 06:43 PM
  #1  
Lone Wolf 87's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Bensalem, PA
Default TJ rubicon vs a regular LJ

So I'm getting the itch to get back into a jeep and the tj years are right in my budget. I decided that I definitely want an automatic so no more stick shifting for me. I ran across the two jeeps, one is a TJ rubicon, and the other is a LJ. Both are low mileage for their years, and both look and drive great. The LJ is 4 grand cheaper, but has more mileage. I like that the LJ has more space. But the TJ was a one owner and locally owned. Not to mention it is a Rubicon! So help me make a decision. What are the pros and cons of each, and of TJs in general. Thanks in advance!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 04:57 AM
  #2  
sacdaddy03's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
From: Franklinton, Louisiana
Default

Tough decision.. The LJ will always be my favorite Jeep. I had a 06 TJ Rubi and was a badass Jeep, but in the smaller TJ's I was hurting for extra room. One of the best differences between the Rubicon TJ/LG platform besides the axles and lockers is the already installed SYE. So no need for t-case mods when lifting. I'm currently in the market for a LJ & really not considering a TJ unless it is a great deal.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 10:45 AM
  #3  
Lone Wolf 87's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Bensalem, PA
Default

Thanks for the info. I'm also leaning toward the LJ platform b/c of the space issue. I also read that if you plan on running bigger tires, like 35s or above the stock rubicon components will have to get scrapped anyway to make way for stronger parts. Man was I spoiled with my old JKs. I didn't realize how much work I'd have to do to upgrade a TJ/LJ. Not that it's a lot, it's just a couple extra steps I would've never thought of or took for granted that the JK came with stock.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
JohnnyQuik's Avatar
JK Freak
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

There's a lot of demand around here for LJ's because of the wheelbase. It makes a much easier plaform for someone looking to build a trail rig.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 02:25 PM
  #5  
sacdaddy03's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
From: Franklinton, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Lone Wolf 87
Thanks for the info. I'm also leaning toward the LJ platform b/c of the space issue. I also read that if you plan on running bigger tires, like 35s or above the stock rubicon components will have to get scrapped anyway to make way for stronger parts. Man was I spoiled with my old JKs. I didn't realize how much work I'd have to do to upgrade a TJ/LJ. Not that it's a lot, it's just a couple extra steps I would've never thought of or took for granted that the JK came with stock.
No doubt on the extra steps to make them "right", that's why I'm looking for an all stock one. I did my 1st TJ the cheap way and it showed big time. Driveline vibes, death wobble, premature tire wear etc.. Now that I am more knowledgeable, I'd rather start from scratch vs. tracing out & fixing trouble areas.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 AM.