Notices
JK CB & HAM Radios Bulletin board forum regarding all topics concerning CB and HAM radios, the installation of them in your Jeep JK Wrangler. This would include antenna mounts, wiring, tuning and usage.

Help tuning CB Antenna

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #21  
Mark Doiron's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
Veteran: Air Force
FJOTM Winner
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,800
Likes: 374
From: Midwest City, OK
Default

Originally Posted by sin52
You should get better(lower swr) readings with the top up. More ground plane, like a truck.
I'm not certain about this. A ground plane needs to be below the base of the antenna. With his two-foot antenna mounted on the third break light, the mass of the softtop frame (you can ignore the fabric--it's virtually invisible to RF) is mostly to one side of the antenna. Therefore, it's going to work more like the forward elements on a directional antenna array. More power will be thrown forward (which may be desirable). However, some will be reflected because the frame is not "tuned" for the specific frequencies involved. IOW: It's going to take an antenna engineer (and he's going to want to run tests) to determine the affect that the softtop is having on the antenna. The best advice in this situation: OP has what he measured. If he's unhappy with that, the best thing for him is a longer antenna that puts more of it above the roofline.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #22  
AK4Dave's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 0
From: Kenai Peninsula, Alaska
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Doiron
I'm not certain about this. A ground plane needs to be below the base of the antenna. With his two-foot antenna mounted on the third break light, the mass of the softtop frame (you can ignore the fabric--it's virtually invisible to RF) is mostly to one side of the antenna. Therefore, it's going to work more like the forward elements on a directional antenna array. More power will be thrown forward (which may be desirable). However, some will be reflected because the frame is not "tuned" for the specific frequencies involved. IOW: It's going to take an antenna engineer (and he's going to want to run tests) to determine the affect that the softtop is having on the antenna. The best advice in this situation: OP has what he measured. If he's unhappy with that, the best thing for him is a longer antenna that puts more of it above the roofline.
I agree, and feel that with the top folded down there is a lot of framework bunched up and sitting close to the antenna. That in itself can make for high swr, and as Mark says it's not tuned...it's just a mass of metal.

If the OP was to get a tuneable antenna, and if he still gets the same results, there is a good chance though that he could tune the antenna for a "happy medium" swr (under 2) with the top up as well as down.

Or......he could at least take readings and make adjustments to the antenna for best swr with the top up and down, and make position marks on the antenna. Then it would only be a matter of loosening the set screw and move the antenna to the mark when he puts the top down.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 05:37 AM
  #23  
sin52's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Omnipresent
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Doiron
I'm not certain about this. A ground plane needs to be below the base of the antenna. With his two-foot antenna mounted on the third break light, the mass of the softtop frame (you can ignore the fabric--it's virtually invisible to RF) is mostly to one side of the antenna. Therefore, it's going to work more like the forward elements on a directional antenna array. More power will be thrown forward (which may be desirable). However, some will be reflected because the frame is not "tuned" for the specific frequencies involved. IOW: It's going to take an antenna engineer (and he's going to want to run tests) to determine the affect that the softtop is having on the antenna. The best advice in this situation: OP has what he measured. If he's unhappy with that, the best thing for him is a longer antenna that puts more of it above the roofline.
I'm just basing my post on my findings with soft top up and down. Of course I got better results with the 3' over the 2', nothing drastic though for swr once tuned. Reception would be worse with an antenna not clearing the top. I got pics of both fwiw and agree, we are saying the same thing, longer adjustable would be better.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #24  
hansen65's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: North Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Doiron
OP has what he measured. If he's unhappy with that, the best thing for him is a longer antenna that puts more of it above the roofline.
Hey guys thanks for the additional info.

FYI, even with the 2' antenna I have almost a foot extending past the roof line. I have the antenna way up on the third brake light. My only concern is the drastic difference between top up and down puts me about 3 swr and I know that is bad for my radio. I will have to try a new antenna latter.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 AM.