2008 3.8 v 2013 3.6
#12
JK Enthusiast
I have a 2011 that had the 3.8 and I hated the insane lack of power. Hated it more because my wife drove a 2013 with the 3.6 so I could feel the difference every day and it sucked. I wish I had gotten off with only a 4k difference but after a supercharger for a year (also sucked) I finally gave up and dropped in a 6.0l V8. I can honestly say that I would have not spent the money on either if I had the pentastar motor in the first place (not that I am unhappy now with my V8 Beast LOL).
#15
JK Junkie
Originally Posted by jchappies
It's not the motor as much as it is the transmission, for that alone i would get the newer one.
#16
#17
Yes the 40hp is nice but its the trans that make all the difference.
The gas mileage is debatable. I've always gotten better mileage out of my 3.8 at the end of every trail than those with a 3.6 running a similar setup. and pretty much the same if not better on the freeway.
The gas mileage is debatable. I've always gotten better mileage out of my 3.8 at the end of every trail than those with a 3.6 running a similar setup. and pretty much the same if not better on the freeway.
#20
yeah but thats 202hp at 5200rpm vs 285hp at 6500prms
I'm not saying the 3.8 is better, its the trans that really making the difference IMO, unless your reving to 6500rpm all the time.
I'm not saying the 3.8 is better, its the trans that really making the difference IMO, unless your reving to 6500rpm all the time.
Last edited by jchappies; 11-02-2017 at 12:30 PM.