Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

3.21, fine?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 07:08 AM
  #1  
Jamesbob220's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Southfield, Mi
Default 3.21, fine?

i know there are threads about the differences, but what i wanna know is, are the people that got the 3.21 regretting not getting the 4.10, or is it just fine?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #2  
bim6180's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Danbury, CT
Default

i have 4.10, but i test drove 3.21..... i'm definitely glad that i took the 4.10
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 08:54 AM
  #3  
Jamesbob220's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Southfield, Mi
Default

i should probably clarify that i have been driving a 1998 ford ranger I4 wtih 119 horsepower. while the 3.21 is less acceleration, is it really going to be as bad as my ranger? im hoping companies stopped making them that under powered : )
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #4  
Rescue X's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Edmond, OK
Default

I've got the 3:21's...I have no regrets...but, I haven't need the low end torque that you would get with 4:10's yet...

I plan on upgrading at some point...but, for now they are good...
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 AM.