Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

New engine worth buying?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:31 AM
  #31  
JK Enthusiast
 
panthermark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by armycop
My numbers came out to (your experience may vary):

$22,900 selling price minus $1,000 rebate and $500 military rebate so: $21,400 for the 2011.

The "Tread Lightly" 1% below invoice price came out to $24,400 for the 2012 with the same equipment (no rebates). So $3,000. Plus I would have to wait 6-8 weeks to order the 2012.

Now add:

$1325 for 5 15" rims and 33" Duratracs
$1200 for regearing @ Northridge4x4
$350 for Rusty's Basic 2" Coil Spring Lift

$24,275 for a modded JK now vs $24,400 for a 2012 which I may get in November.
While I think you got a good deal, there are a couple of quick items to point out.
#1 You would have still gotten $500 off of a 2012 with your military rebate.
#2 You could have purchased a 2012 off the lot (as you did with the 2011) and not waited until November.
#3 Many people are getting below 1% invoice. Pat here in Chicago is doing a no haggle flat 2% under invoice for TL/Affiliate programs.

But as I stated, you still managed to do well. Before rebates, it looks like that 2011 was being sold WELL below invoice to begin with if it was being sold at $22,900 while inovice on a 2012 with the same options was roughly $24,600.
Old 09-14-2011, 05:16 AM
  #32  
JK Enthusiast
 
WCDAVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=panthermark;2529698#3 - Everyone talks about HP....but most of that HP comes in over 4000 RPM's. No one spends a lot of time there. The BIG boost in the torque. The new engine reaches over 95% of its peak (250 out of 260 lb-ft) torque at roughly 2000 RPM's. It is at or above 250 lb-ft from 2000 RPM's alway the way to roughly 5500 RPM's. The old engine never reaches 250 lb-ft....the peak is 237 lb-ft at 4000 RPM's.[/QUOTE]

The main reason no one spends any time there in a 3.8 is because at that RPM the vehicle sounds like it's going to explode. The 3.6 is so much smoother into the rev range making it a lot more comfortable to drive at higher RPMs. Contrary to what many on this forum say, rock crawling is not most Jeeps' full time avocation; higher revs are part and parcel of daily driving. If you are content with your pre-Pentastar JK though, be happy. There is always a new "New". In a couple of years, maybe sooner, there will be a Jeep that eclipses the current one. I won't waste time trying to argue that mine is somehow better, or just as good. It just is what it is; the predecessor to the current (future) model that Jeep in their R&D has made better.
Old 09-14-2011, 05:51 AM
  #33  
JK Enthusiast
 
tncruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: tn
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would think that if you find the 3'8 to puny and not up to the task then a 3.6 will only be marginally better
what happens next year when they increase power another 30% do you trade again
the next model is always perceived better by some,i ve never had a straight 6 but im sure i would like it
but govt regs and marketing determine what we can get and if you have ti have the newest and best vehicle
every year you will be wasting a lot of your future wealth,and dont ask how i know. but i hvae spent a lot of my
life pursuing pretty woman,nice cars and good times i just wasted the rest
if youre set on doing it just put a v8 in then ya got sumthin
brianj
Old 09-14-2011, 06:02 AM
  #34  
JK Enthusiast
 
jbry311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My buddy just traded in his '08 for a '12 and it's definitely a noticeable power increase. If you're mainly on trails and the jeep isn't your daily driver then the upgrade doesn't make too much sense, but if you're like me and the jeep is a daily driver, then I think the new engine is the way to go. I'll be trading in my '07 for a '12 in 6 months or so. I thought about adding a supercharger to my '07, but putting another $5k in a 5 year old jeep with 53k miles doesn't make a lot of sense to me anymore.
Old 09-14-2011, 06:31 AM
  #35  
JK Enthusiast
 
WCDAVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jbry311
My buddy just traded in his '08 for a '12 and it's definitely a noticeable power increase. If you're mainly on trails and the jeep isn't your daily driver then the upgrade doesn't make too much sense, but if you're like me and the jeep is a daily driver, then I think the new engine is the way to go. I'll be trading in my '07 for a '12 in 6 months or so. I thought about adding a supercharger to my '07, but putting another $5k in a 5 year old jeep with 53k miles doesn't make a lot of sense to me anymore.
WINNER! of the common sense award. I love the guys that go "Well, I'm saving $5grand by getting an '11 vs. a '12 or keeping my '08 and I'll put a supercharger in it." Well Ok, but #1, if you put the $5grand you saved into your vehicle, you didn't "save" anything. And #2, have you checked out the issues guys that have SC'd their rigs are experiencing? Granted some have had great success with SC-ing their ride, but others have had interminable nightmares with it. It's not for the casual weekend wrench. The performance gain from an SC is a lot over the stock 3.8, but I think most guys would be "satisfied" with the power from a 3.6 stock, that retains at least some measure of warranty. In my mind the 3.6 clears the way to focus on mods other than engine performance mods. Those, to me anyway, are the fun ones.
Old 09-14-2011, 07:06 AM
  #36  
JK Freak
 
EarlyJk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Prov. , RI
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WCDAVE

WINNER! of the common sense award. I love the guys that go "Well, I'm saving $5grand by getting an '11 vs. a '12 or keeping my '08 and I'll put a supercharger in it." Well Ok, but #1, if you put the $5grand you saved into your vehicle, you didn't "save" anything. And #2, have you checked out the issues guys that have SC'd their rigs are experiencing? Granted some have had great success with SC-ing their ride, but others have had interminable nightmares with it. It's not for the casual weekend wrench. The performance gain from an SC is a lot over the stock 3.8, but I think most guys would be "satisfied" with the power from a 3.6 stock, that retains at least some measure of warranty. In my mind the 3.6 clears the way to focus on mods other than engine performance mods. Those, to me anyway, are the fun ones.
I dont trust alum block for off-roading purpose, for me iron block is much more durable. I think the 12 went the way of cardom(which i know they needed to do to keep the brand alive). Nothing about the upgrades get me excited in the least.
Old 09-14-2011, 09:03 AM
  #37  
JK Freak
 
XBlacky08X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Holyoke, MA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I feel the same way. I want to at least wait a few yrs and enjoy my current rig while seeing how these new pentastars hold up both on road and off. Maybe in 2015 or so when my rig is paid off I will buy a new one while still keeping my current one!

Last edited by XBlacky08X; 09-14-2011 at 09:08 AM.
Old 09-14-2011, 10:38 AM
  #38  
JK Enthusiast
 
WCDAVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EarlyJk
I dont trust alum block for off-roading purpose, for me iron block is much more durable.
Why? Aluminum blocks have been employed in high heat applications, even subject to immersion in marine applications, for a long time. In fact, I haven't had a non-aluminum block engine in 10 years. An aluminum block is not exactly "new-fangled". Certainly it is up to you what affords you a measure of cofidence in a material though.
Old 09-14-2011, 12:38 PM
  #39  
JK Enthusiast
 
jhol111964's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: heart of dixie
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by offcamber
I don't think you'll save more than $1000 on a 2011. I looked at both. I got my 2012 rubicon unlimited below invoice (MSRP was $41,747, I paid $36,700) and the only option it doesn't have is dual tops( but that may be because it has the painted top and flares). I considered a 2011 if I could save 3-4K. I figured if I could save that much I could use some of that to improve performance. When I found that I wasn't going to save but about $1,000 and I drove the 2012, I knew that there is no way short of supercharging the 2011 that it was going to be close.
So which is it?

A) Buy the 2012! Its 40% more powerful/faster/etc! Its worth the 4K extra over the discounted 2011!
b) Buy the 2012! It only costs a 1k more than a 2011, and its 40% more powerful/faster/etc!
3) Buy the 2012! The 2011's are dogs, and are discounted 4k because no one wants them!

I've heard all three.
Old 09-14-2011, 08:11 PM
  #40  
JK Enthusiast
 
WranglerJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WCDAVE
Why? Aluminum blocks have been employed in high heat applications, even subject to immersion in marine applications, for a long time. In fact, I haven't had a non-aluminum block engine in 10 years. An aluminum block is not exactly "new-fangled". Certainly it is up to you what affords you a measure of cofidence in a material though.

No doubt. Serously we are not building drag racing engines here... Aluminum block can take some serious abuse. I'm pretty sure if a honda can take a massive turbo pushing 20-30 psi and 5 and 600 HP to the wheels that this 3.6L can take simple bolt on's and even a SC.


Quick Reply: New engine worth buying?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 PM.