Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.
View Poll Results: Do you like your 3.8L?
Yes
79
52.67%
No
71
47.33%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll

Really that bad?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #31  
AZJeeper's Avatar
Super Moderator
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 89
From: Arizona
Default

I'm OK with the 3.8 - gets me where I want to go. But a 5.7 Hemi option would have been nice.

My 2009 Dodge 1500 Hemi delivers 390 HP and 407 ft lbs of torque - and it gets better gas mileage with its MDS system.

The Jeep is my first love though. The Dodge pickup is just for hauling. (hauling stuff or hauling a$$)

Last edited by AZJeeper; Aug 6, 2009 at 08:16 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #32  
Jason_G's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

I had a Dakota with a 120 hp 2.5 L four-banger in it before, so "minivan engine" bedamned, I am thrilled to death with my 3.8 L. I was getting 16 mpg with my Dakota, vs. 18 mpg with my Jeep. And that 18 mpg was measured with 4 people in it, with the top down, and on winding mountain roads with constant acceleration/deceleration. No, it's not a Hemi, but it does what I need it to do, and I am happy with it.

Jason
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #33  
roadking54's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Default

[QUOTE=db99wj;1269079]No IMO.

Just to let you know what I am coming from, for the last 5 years I have had a Jeep Grand Cherokee with the 4.7L V8.


I second that, I've had two V8 Grand Cherokee's over the last 10 years and now my unlimited. I can't gun it out into traffic like I used to, but I don't really care. I no longer pass 10 cars at an incline on mtn passes, but I do love every second I'm behind the wheel and take in all the scenery! I had the same concerns before I made my purchase, and I am perfectly satisfied with its power and my decision
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 08:06 AM
  #34  
FlameRed's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Default

I also had a V8 Grand Cherokee before my wrangler, and a V8 Chevy Silverado before that, so it definately took a few weeks for me to realize that I was no longer going to be flying past everyone on the freeway. That being said I had so many speeding tickets with the old cars that I actually got the letter saying that if I got one more I was going to lose my liscense. So... not only do I love my new Jeep more than I thought it was possible to love a vehicle, but it is also helping me be more responsible (i.e. off CHP radar). Also, going off roading I haven't had any problems as long as I keep it in 4 Lo.

Like I told my friend who got a new truck the same weekend I got the Jeep when she asked "want to race?" "Jeeps aren't built for speed, they are built for awesomeness!"
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #35  
Yankee's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 2
From: B.F.E, MI
Default

Originally Posted by JKMan321
Is the 3.8L really that bad?
3.8 in a Rubicon in 4-lo is fine. Really that bad depends on what you are used to I guess. Rowing through the 6 speed on the road was not fun for me. But, I was spoiled by having all my other vehicles have V-8's which accelerated to 60 with gentle skinny pedal input and the engine not whining about it.

When I start adding weight (larger tires, heavy rims, lift, armor, etc) I do not see how performance would improve.

I love my very first Jeep, plan to have it until I cannot patch it up anymore. I do not miss that 3.8.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:24 AM.