Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Rubicon Express Long Arm Kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #1  
wayoflife's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK-Forum Founder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 16
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default Rubicon Express Long Arm Kit

Okay, I know this may be old news for some of you but for those of you who haven't heard, rumor has it that Rubicon Express will be unveiling a long arm kit at SEMA. Of course, that in and of itself is not so suprising but what is, is the fact that they decided to use front and rear radius arms.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
JKwannabe's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Ohio/Kentucky
Default

i bet that pushes a lot of people over to the full traction camp...
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #3  
Jeepin Jason's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Given that the gas tank takes up all the space on the passenger side, I'm curious to see how everyone else does long-arm kits. For the most part I really don't see any issues with using a radius arm setup for the rear, isn't that what the Land Rover Defender and Discovery have from the factory?

It's pretty easy to guess what Nth Degree's kit will look like though, they really don't have to change much of their current design at all, just adapt their existing kit to fit the new vehicle. Makes you wonder if they were planning ahead for this exact situation...

What's interesting about the RE kit is that if you look at the angle of the rear arms, they're really no flatter than arms in the stock location would be, due to how high up the new arms mount on the frame, they're just much longer.

Last edited by Jeepin Jason; Nov 1, 2006 at 11:01 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 06:28 AM
  #4  
Piginajeep's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,133
Likes: 0
From: O HI 4 Lo
Default

Jason

this is how they did the long arm
http://project-jk.com/wp-gallery2.php?g2_itemId=4514
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #5  
Jeepin Jason's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Yes, I know, RE's kit uses rear radius arms. Tera and SkyJacker both have 4link setups. I'm curious about how their kits will handle though because it looks like their upper links are much shorter than their lower links, both front and rear.

I do like how SkyJacker is using a raised trackbar bracket on the rear axle though, as opposed to many others that are using a drop bracket on the frame. That should help stability in offcamber situations. All the other kits I've seen pics of, other than Superlift, use a drop bracket on the frame for the rear trackbar.

edit: after looking at more pics, SkyJacker's "long-arm" kit appears to only use long lower arms, the uppers seem to be stock length, in the stock locations (???). If so, that's pretty lame IMHO.

Also, Rancho's kit is REALLY interesting (not sure if in a good way or bad way yet), with their reverse-mounted upper A-arm. http://project-jk.com/wp-gallery2.php?g2_itemId=6029

Last edited by Jeepin Jason; Nov 1, 2006 at 02:26 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #6  
Piginajeep's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,133
Likes: 0
From: O HI 4 Lo
Default

I'll be interested to see if they actually sell that lift,(rancho)

And it has the stock drive shafts, so I'm sure its going to be a trailer queen.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #7  
dhoffroad's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Ukiah CA. (nor-cal)
Default

Originally Posted by Jeepin Jason
Rancho's kit is REALLY interesting (not sure if in a good way or bad way yet), with their reverse-mounted upper A-arm. http://project-jk.com/wp-gallery2.php?g2_itemId=6029
I remember Walker Evans had a comp crawler a few years ago that had a set up like that in the front but for some reason I can't remember I think they scraped that seutp like half way thru the season.....
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 4, 2006 | 03:33 AM
  #8  
over's tj's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default give time for R&D or you will be the test MULE

[QUOTE=
What's interesting about the RE kit is that if you look at the angle of the rear arms, they're really no flatter than arms in the stock location would be, due to how high up the new arms mount on the frame, they're just much longer.[/QUOTE]

for guys that play on the big rocks, the mounts being tucked up is nice but not if the long arms offer little benifit because of angle

lets hope that these suspension designs are well thought out and tested as to there function in real world on & off-road, a good lfted suspension design is not black science but if is alot more then just longer arms and taller springs

I like the way Nth degree are real tech geeks in there design, I just don't know if there kits are tough enough for extreme rock trails with 35-37" tires
anyone have there full system on a TJ with input?

I think the only way to find out who produces the best system is to wait it out for them to just prove themselfs, anyone remember in late '96 early '97 when the TJ came out, the only players were TeraFlex and A couple others, it was what 3-4 years later that RE and others came out with the long arm? granted nowadays it shouldent take as long but R & D takes time, do you really think the priority for alot of the SEMA mfg's was to test there products before the show, alot were lucky to even get JKs' much less get there components on them before the show
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 06:25 AM
  #9  
Jeepin Jason's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by BeerMonkey
if the angle is still the same whats the point? isnt that the point of a long arm to reduce the angle of the arm to the axle? the rancho one is diferent. i know a full reverse 4-link is bad (at least ona lowered/bagged truck) but a partial one is weird. wouldnt the 2 fight each other at suspension compression? unless the rear had some kind of slip yolk type thing to let the axle move foward
Even if the angle is still the same, the arms are longer, meaning the axle will swing in a larger arc, resulting in more linear wheel travel. Droop that axle 6" down and with short arms it'll swing a lot further forward than with RE's arms, even if both arms start at the same angle.

On Rancho's kit, it's a watts link setup, only turned sideways so that the axle is the crank. The links aren't going to bind or fight eachother, they'll just cause the axle to rotate slightly. How much the axle rotates depends on how Rancho setup the geometry of the kit. If they did it right, it should have very little pinion angle change, if they did it wrong, that pinion is going to be all over the place.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #10  
Burnsville's Avatar
Sponsor
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

I second that on the linear wheel travel with the RE set up. I have been running 3 JK's since October with the RE longarms and will say they are worth every penny. 2 of these JK's have hemi's. Every JK I am building right now is getting the RE longarm for the reason that I can run the factory SRT8 exhaust manifolds after cutting off the front upper control arm mounts.
Dan
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.