Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Why the "JK" designation?

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #1  
JK Dawg's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Default Why the "JK" designation?

Jeeps have always been CJs, YJs, TJs, XJs or other such designations where it was a letter followed by a "J". Anyone have an idea why the "J" came firstfor the new Wranglers? Not a big deal, just curious.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
Goose's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

The JK was actually supposed to be called the "TK," from what I've read. Someone at Chrysler mentioned that Wranglers and their predecessors had always had a "J" in them, so they dropped the T and made it a J. KJ wouldn't work because that was already taken by the Liberty.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #3  
echofoxtrot's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada
Default

All the current Jeeps have K as the second letter of the designation. So they couldn't use KJ even if the Libby had a different one.

The others are:
XK - Commander
WK- Grand Cherokee
KK - Liberty
MK - Patriot/Compass
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #4  
Firedog73's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: Guntersville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by JK Dawg
Jeeps have always been CJs, YJs, TJs, XJs or other such designations where it was a letter followed by a "J". Anyone have an idea why the "J" came firstfor the new Wranglers? Not a big deal, just curious.

It's because they called it a wrangler then droped a 3.6 in it.

It's a Wrangler "JK" stands for Just Kidding
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #5  
Goose's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by echofoxtrot
All the current Jeeps have K as the second letter of the designation. So they couldn't use KJ even if the Libby had a different one.

The others are:
XK - Commander
WK- Grand Cherokee
KK - Liberty
MK - Patriot/Compass
Interesting... That's good to know...
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
Firedog73's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: Guntersville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Firedog73
It's because they called it a wrangler then droped a 3.6 in it.

It's a Wrangler "JK" stands for Just Kidding

Man I am cynical tonight

I Love my JK I sold my last 3 because they had no room I will trade the mini van engine for the mini van room
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:47 PM
  #7  
JK Dawg's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Firedog73
Man I am cynical tonight

I Love my JK I sold my last 3 because they had no room I will trade the mini van engine for the mini van room
If they needed a V6 for the JK, its too bad Chrysler didn't use the 250hp 3.5 from the base 300.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #8  
UCLA JK Rida''s Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA.
Default

The new Wrangler was originally going to be designated the "FJK"... short for "FJ Killer"...but Chrysler in its "infinite wisdom" didn't want to make the Toyota loyalists all butt hurt...and so it goes.


Russ D.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 04:33 AM
  #9  
bkomlyn's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

On a more serious note, I thought the designation change had more to do with this being a complete remodel. The CJ, YJ,and TJ were all pretty much the same platform and frame, with only minor changes. Even the XJ Cherokee shared lots of stuff with the YJ and TJ. But, with the new wrangler, it is completely differnt fromits predecessors, so they went with a completely new designation.

Thats only my theory, though.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #10  
bOLsAK=3's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,288
Likes: 0
From: Treasure Coast, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by JK Dawg
If they needed a V6 for the JK, its too bad Chrysler didn't use the 250hp 3.5 from the base 300.
Are you kidding??? That would only make sense!!! Who puts a powerful, fuel efficient engine in a Jeep? Pffff.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:08 PM.