Notices
JK Wheels and Tires For all questions and answers concerning Wheels and Tires for Jeep JKs.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

post your true tire diameters

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-28-2013, 04:58 AM
  #11  
JK Jedi

 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: missoula,mt
Posts: 4,364
Received 107 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by karls
The "true" size depends on more factors than Tire Rack can factor.


To the OP- true tire size will depend on weight of the vehicle, air pressure, and rim width- so expect the numbers to be off between everyone.

Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk
yes X100.....
Old 11-28-2013, 05:18 AM
  #12  
JK Enthusiast
 
TJJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

33.25 @ 32 psi with 285/75/17 KM2s
Old 11-28-2013, 05:20 AM
  #13  
JK Enthusiast
 
TJJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TJJK
33.25 @ 32 psi with 285/75/17 KM2s
... on factory 7.5s
Old 11-28-2013, 10:29 AM
  #14  
JK Enthusiast
 
TxJeepers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

35x12.50r17 KM2 on 17x8.5 on JKUR with 30psi. 33.5" is what I measured and used with me Procal.

Previous JKUR with 315/70r17 Duratrac on 17x9 with 32psi. 33.5".


BFGoodrich website says that size is 34.8.
Goodyear website says that size is 34.4.
Old 11-28-2013, 10:43 AM
  #15  
JK Newbie
 
Trev8908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

35 12.50 17 bfg km2 on 17x9 measured at 33.75. Found that when measuring for my flashcal.
Old 11-28-2013, 10:48 AM
  #16  
JK Newbie
 
John.M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

315-75/R-16. Two door JK. 37psi. Nitto Terra Grapplers.

Procal has 33.75" loaded, and me speedo is still off a small bit (likely smaller). On 16x8 wheels.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
Old 11-28-2013, 11:11 AM
  #17  
Forum Tech Advisor
 
planman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Invest2m4
I see this come up often. Yes, overall height will be less than specified when weighted. However, for the purpose of fitment, the radius is what matters. Take a 37" that actually measures 37" off a wheel. Throw the weight of a jeep on it and from the center of the hub to the ground, it is less than half of 37". From the hub center to any other point, it will be half 37". The bottom flattens, not the rest of the tire.
It doesn't work that way for speedometer programming. Diameter will give you a correct speed, not radius.

If the wheel width exactly matched the tire bead width and the tire psi were exactly right, then radius if an unmounted tire might be the same to the top. However, tires flex and bulge. So, the radius to the top when the tire is bulged on a narrower wheel can exceed the unmounted radius.
Old 11-28-2013, 11:27 AM
  #18  
JK Junkie
 
Tooadvanced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: West Richland Washington
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by planman

It doesn't work that way for speedometer programming. Diameter will give you a correct speed, not radius.

If the wheel width exactly matched the tire bead width and the tire psi were exactly right, then radius if an unmounted tire might be the same to the top. However, tires flex and bulge. So, the radius to the top when the tire is bulged on a narrower wheel can exceed the unmounted radius.
Measuring to the bottom while parked may be different when park than when in motion though correct? Wouldn't centrifugal force cause the center of the tire to expand thus creating a different radius/diameter? May be thinking of this wrong and or maybe change is so minor that it doesn't matter
Old 11-28-2013, 01:17 PM
  #19  
Forum Tech Advisor
 
planman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tooadvanced
Measuring to the bottom while parked may be different when park than when in motion though correct? Wouldn't centrifugal force cause the center of the tire to expand thus creating a different radius/diameter? May be thinking of this wrong and or maybe change is so minor that it doesn't matter
It doesn't make that much difference.

If you measure to the top of the tire while parked and use that measurement in your ProCal/Superchips/Diablosport, you should be close to exact with your speedometer when verified with a GPS.
Old 11-28-2013, 01:35 PM
  #20  
JK Junkie
 
Tooadvanced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: West Richland Washington
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by planman

It doesn't make that much difference.

If you measure to the top of the tire while parked and use that measurement in your ProCal/Superchips/Diablosport, you should be close to exact with your speedometer when verified with a GPS.
Ok and that makes sense. For some reason I thought someone said to measure from center to bottom and I was thinking that it would be under compression but measuring to top makes sense


Quick Reply: post your true tire diameters



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 AM.