OK bs
This help at all?? 63 according to that chart?? 63 really.. i would assume even number.. 63 is my final answer..
http://project-jk.com/jeep-jk-write-...orque-settings
This help at all?? 63 according to that chart?? 63 really.. i would assume even number.. 63 is my final answer..
This help at all?? 63 according to that chart?? 63 really.. i would assume even number.. 63 is my final answer..
. http://project-jk.com/jeep-jk-write-...ings#frontsuspDrag link to Knuckle (Right Side) 74N.m / 55 ft.lbs
Drag link to Knuckle 74N.m / 55 ft.lbs
I think the one you were looking at was the Drag Link Ball Stud to Knuckle

Last edited by interceptor_1972; Mar 25, 2011 at 11:50 AM.
Wrong answer
. http://project-jk.com/jeep-jk-write-...ings#frontsusp
Drag link to Knuckle (Right Side) 74N.m / 55 ft.lbs
Drag link to Knuckle 74N.m / 55 ft.lbs
. http://project-jk.com/jeep-jk-write-...ings#frontsuspDrag link to Knuckle (Right Side) 74N.m / 55 ft.lbs
Drag link to Knuckle 74N.m / 55 ft.lbs
. On the plus side, if he got to 63, he would be good anyways - since he'd passed 55
Yes sir, that you were
. Matter of fact, I seen where you got the 63 ft. lbs, not sure what the difference is there. Wonder if that's the torque for the ball joint to the drag link?
. On the plus side, if he got to 63, he would be good anyways - since he'd passed 55 
. On the plus side, if he got to 63, he would be good anyways - since he'd passed 55 
Originally Posted by bigcjeep
http://project-jk.com/jeep-jk-write-...orque-settings
This help at all?? 63 according to that chart?? 63 really.. i would assume even number.. 63 is my final answer..


