Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

33 and 35 km2 comparison (pics)

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #1  
toyfreak's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: BOOMER SOONER!! (Piedmont OK)
Default 33 and 35 km2 comparison (pics)

I could not make up my mind so I had my local Discount Tire mount one of each up for me so I could look at it. Wanted to see if the 35's looked $1250 dollars better (which is what i figured it would cost me total for the extra rubber and gears).

They didn't.

this is before the TF 2.5
Click image for larger version

Name:	P7280304.jpg
Views:	943
Size:	96.1 KB
ID:	27702
33's and 35's
Click image for larger version

Name:	P7290305.jpg
Views:	1100
Size:	91.3 KB
ID:	27706
Click image for larger version

Name:	P7290307.jpg
Views:	1809
Size:	91.6 KB
ID:	27704
Click image for larger version

Name:	P7290309.jpg
Views:	907
Size:	97.4 KB
ID:	27705
Click image for larger version

Name:	olympus 026.jpg
Views:	1426
Size:	92.6 KB
ID:	27718

Last edited by toyfreak; Jul 30, 2009 at 05:55 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #2  
JK-KJ's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 0
From: Odenville, AL
Default

Looks good....I'm in the same boat actually. When it's time for tires again, I really would rather move up to 35's but I would have to do the gears also and that means even spending even more money that I don't have! I think 33's are big enough for me...they've gotten me everywhere I've been so far!

Admittedly, it does look much better with the 35's though....but like I said, I understand why you went with the 33's.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
toyfreak's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: BOOMER SOONER!! (Piedmont OK)
Default

Yeah the 35's might fill a little better but LOOKS are not my main concern, I want function and since im approx. 3 hours from any real wheelin i didnt see the point.

My jeep had a body lift on it when i bought it and i think that makes a big difference too.

If I get to a spot on the trail that I cant get through because I dont have 35's then maybe i will consider it but until then its 3's for me.

Last edited by toyfreak; Jul 29, 2009 at 07:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #4  
rballman's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Englewood, CO
Default

hmm which ones are which... also, did you add a front spacer to your jeep? it looks like the rake is gone with the new rubber

what size rims are those?

EDIT: oops, i thought you wrote after TF

Last edited by rballman; Jul 29, 2009 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 11:34 PM
  #5  
RA070424's Avatar
Former Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

For $1250 you could have gotten a set of 35's. BFG's are great, but overpriced in comparison. I'd save my money and look elsewhere.

I'll bet it looks nice in person. Pics don't do it justice.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 01:33 AM
  #6  
rubious's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: ashland ky
Default

nice post! i'm glad someone did this actually. it gives us all something to look at and compare. and now i know.... i want at LEAST 35's!!!!!!!!! and i be 37's would be that much better.

great looking rig tho. hope you enjoy it! and being 3 hrs away from wheeling i'd would have done what u did
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 02:36 AM
  #7  
greenamphibious's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

35s looked WAAAAAY better
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 02:45 AM
  #8  
pearl-drum-man's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

For me there's no doubt that I'd rather have 35's vs 33's, but the main thing to consider is all the additional costs involved to run 35's properly vs. 33's makes it go far beyond just the cost of the tires themselves.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 03:19 AM
  #9  
toyfreak's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: BOOMER SOONER!! (Piedmont OK)
Default

The 17 year old in me said 35's all the way, but the 34 year old made up his mind before he even got to see the comparison and said NO!

Really just took the pic for the forum, its what i wanted to see when i was trying to decide.

They do look different in person for those who care about looks. I will take another pic at a different angle, straight on dosent work to well.

I think minus the 1 inch body lift would make a difference also. might take it off.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 03:33 AM
  #10  
racer83l's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Default

to me, the difference form 33's to 35's was HUGE. I am very glad I got 35's

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM.