Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

38" tires

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
rubi08unlimited's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
From: Keene, New Hampshire, United States
Default 38" tires

Who has em and if you are coming from 37s, are you happy with them and what options are there for 38s besides MTRs and KM2s? Any additional mods over what was needed for 37s?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2014 | 04:07 AM
  #2  
Invest2m4's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 2
From: Grosse Pointe, MI
Default

I went through the same research process a month ago. My conclusion was to stick with 37s. All 38s worth owning are 14.5" or wider. So right away you have clearance issues to tackle, a lot more stress on the drivetrain, and you'll most likely need hydro assist steering.

Assuming you are cool with that, I didn't find any conclusive evidence that the 38s were better off road, except for in sand (or mud bogs I'd guess). In addition, a 12.50 tire is better in the rocks. More pressure per square inch and the weight of the JK is enough to form the tread around the rock.

The last and best point people made is that if something happened on the trail, no one would likely have a 38" tire to borrow and you won't find them stocked anywhere.

I don't have white papers to back all this up, but just sharing what I came away with when I considered 38s.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2014 | 08:17 AM
  #3  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

I call 38's a mudder tire too because of the width and while the extra 1/2" of height is desirable the width is not. You basiclly have to build to run a 40" tire to have the clearance to run the wide 38" tires out there. IF you have to build to fit a 40" tire, why not run a 40" tire and gain 1.5" of height over the 37's.

Kinda the conclusion I came to when going big.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2014 | 09:39 AM
  #4  
DAAM421's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: NY LI HUNTINGTON
Default Pitbull tires

Originally Posted by rubi08unlimited
Who has em and if you are coming from 37s, are you happy with them and what options are there for 38s besides MTRs and KM2s? Any additional mods over what was needed for 37s?
I have mad dog 38.5 x 13.5 x 17 perfect no issue like other post said

next will be pitbull rockers
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2014 | 08:20 AM
  #5  
rubi08unlimited's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
From: Keene, New Hampshire, United States
Default I think if more people saw these in person, it would change their mind...

Click image for larger version

Name:	10008631_10203249159970265_1117751119_n.jpg
Views:	246
Size:	42.0 KB
ID:	537110Click image for larger version

Name:	10002662_10203249160370275_1524899709_n.jpg
Views:	233
Size:	42.9 KB
ID:	537111Click image for larger version

Name:	$_35.JPG
Views:	222
Size:	19.0 KB
ID:	537112
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2014 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
Maertz's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 2
From: Neenah, Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Invest2m4
I went through the same research process a month ago. My conclusion was to stick with 37s. All 38s worth owning are 14.5" or wider. So right away you have clearance issues to tackle, a lot more stress on the drivetrain, and you'll most likely need hydro assist steering.

Assuming you are cool with that, I didn't find any conclusive evidence that the 38s were better off road, except for in sand (or mud bogs I'd guess). In addition, a 12.50 tire is better in the rocks. More pressure per square inch and the weight of the JK is enough to form the tread around the rock.

The last and best point people made is that if something happened on the trail, no one would likely have a 38" tire to borrow and you won't find them stocked anywhere.

I don't have white papers to back all this up, but just sharing what I came away with when I considered 38s.

interesting i always wanted a 13.5 or wider tire in the rocks. not smaller. Yes the pressure per square inch goes down, but doesn't the coefficient of friction go up?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2014 | 09:05 PM
  #7  
rubi08unlimited's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
From: Keene, New Hampshire, United States
Default

"mud" tires are skinny, cut to the bottom of the pit and get traction. I just think 14.50 is proportional to a 35x12.50, 37x13.50 etc...
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 17, 2014 | 09:15 PM
  #8  
sea bass's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 998
Likes: 1
From: Enumclaw,WA
Default

Originally Posted by rubi08unlimited
"mud" tires are skinny, cut to the bottom of the pit and get traction. I just think 14.50 is proportional to a 35x12.50, 37x13.50 etc...
Not if the pit is bottomless. You'll just dig until you're hung up on your frame/axles. Lots of flotation is benifitial.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2014 | 09:41 PM
  #9  
courtsm3's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 910
Likes: 1
From: chilliwack BC
Default

Just got my 37's put on today. I couldnt see going any bigger without a good amount of driveline/axle work. Im finally content.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2014 | 09:49 PM
  #10  
fitzb's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Roseville, Ca
Default

I went from 37 to 38 mtr, not much diff in cost. I think they have a better stance than the 37. With that said, I did have to cut pinch seam and ended up trussing the front with artec truss. Very happy with them so far.



Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1437272316.jpg
Views:	223
Size:	85.8 KB
ID:	538504
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:04 AM.