38" tires
01-31-2014, 09:22 PM
#1
JK Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Keene, New Hampshire, United States
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
38" tires
Who has em and if you are coming from 37s, are you happy with them and what options are there for 38s besides MTRs and KM2s? Any additional mods over what was needed for 37s?
02-01-2014, 04:07 AM
#2
JK Junkie
I went through the same research process a month ago. My conclusion was to stick with 37s. All 38s worth owning are 14.5" or wider. So right away you have clearance issues to tackle, a lot more stress on the drivetrain, and you'll most likely need hydro assist steering.
Assuming you are cool with that, I didn't find any conclusive evidence that the 38s were better off road, except for in sand (or mud bogs I'd guess). In addition, a 12.50 tire is better in the rocks. More pressure per square inch and the weight of the JK is enough to form the tread around the rock.
The last and best point people made is that if something happened on the trail, no one would likely have a 38" tire to borrow and you won't find them stocked anywhere.
I don't have white papers to back all this up, but just sharing what I came away with when I considered 38s.
Assuming you are cool with that, I didn't find any conclusive evidence that the 38s were better off road, except for in sand (or mud bogs I'd guess). In addition, a 12.50 tire is better in the rocks. More pressure per square inch and the weight of the JK is enough to form the tread around the rock.
The last and best point people made is that if something happened on the trail, no one would likely have a 38" tire to borrow and you won't find them stocked anywhere.
I don't have white papers to back all this up, but just sharing what I came away with when I considered 38s.
02-01-2014, 08:17 AM
#3
JK Jedi
I call 38's a mudder tire too because of the width and while the extra 1/2" of height is desirable the width is not. You basiclly have to build to run a 40" tire to have the clearance to run the wide 38" tires out there. IF you have to build to fit a 40" tire, why not run a 40" tire and gain 1.5" of height over the 37's.
Kinda the conclusion I came to when going big.
Kinda the conclusion I came to when going big.
02-01-2014, 09:39 AM
#4
JK Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY LI HUNTINGTON
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pitbull tires
next will be pitbull rockers
03-13-2014, 08:39 AM
#6
JK Jedi
I went through the same research process a month ago. My conclusion was to stick with 37s. All 38s worth owning are 14.5" or wider. So right away you have clearance issues to tackle, a lot more stress on the drivetrain, and you'll most likely need hydro assist steering.
Assuming you are cool with that, I didn't find any conclusive evidence that the 38s were better off road, except for in sand (or mud bogs I'd guess). In addition, a 12.50 tire is better in the rocks. More pressure per square inch and the weight of the JK is enough to form the tread around the rock.
The last and best point people made is that if something happened on the trail, no one would likely have a 38" tire to borrow and you won't find them stocked anywhere.
I don't have white papers to back all this up, but just sharing what I came away with when I considered 38s.
Assuming you are cool with that, I didn't find any conclusive evidence that the 38s were better off road, except for in sand (or mud bogs I'd guess). In addition, a 12.50 tire is better in the rocks. More pressure per square inch and the weight of the JK is enough to form the tread around the rock.
The last and best point people made is that if something happened on the trail, no one would likely have a 38" tire to borrow and you won't find them stocked anywhere.
I don't have white papers to back all this up, but just sharing what I came away with when I considered 38s.
interesting i always wanted a 13.5 or wider tire in the rocks. not smaller. Yes the pressure per square inch goes down, but doesn't the coefficient of friction go up?
Trending Topics
03-17-2014, 09:15 PM
#8
03-17-2014, 09:49 PM
#10
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Roseville, Ca
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went from 37 to 38 mtr, not much diff in cost. I think they have a better stance than the 37. With that said, I did have to cut pinch seam and ended up trussing the front with artec truss. Very happy with them so far.
