Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

4.7 engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 03:37 PM
  #1  
rws's Avatar
rws
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default 4.7 engine swap

I think it's a great motor, reliable, pretty gutsy, and can pick up a new one for less than 2k.. Anyone ever put one in a JK? Thoughts?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 03:46 PM
  #2  
Battlefrog's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 2
From: Newport news, va
Default

Nope, but hoping you will keep us posted on the swap...
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 04:46 PM
  #3  
rws's Avatar
rws
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

I won't be doing one soon, but next year I was thinking of doing one and was leaning towards an LS3 swap. After doing the research, Dynatrac told me an LS3 would put a huge strain on D60s and could lunch them. So an LS3 would probably require D70s front and back. Then I stumbled on a new 4.7 for an 04 Grand Cherokee for $1800 which got me thinking.. A 550hp LS3 is overkill, even though it would be cool as hell. And my old GC had a 4.7 in it and it had balls to it. I would imagine it would work with the JK comps, smaller in size so no overheating problems, and have more than enough power to make a JK with 37s fun and put you in your seat when you need to get somewhere quick..
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #4  
raidue's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, BC
Default

I loved that engine in my Dakota too! Tons of balls.

I think I remember reading an article in JP magazine that rated it as one of the worst engine swaps for the JK. I think I still have that issue kicking around to confirm.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 05:32 PM
  #5  
TROUPP's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Grover, pa
Default

I believe the limiting factor is that the electronics on the 4.7 are not closely related to anything in the jeep.. And the hemi uses many of the same controls. I believe I saw a discussion on this once on aev's site. The hemi does need a special computer, but the 4.7 would need entire harnesses and custom gauges, as the canbus signals aren't compatible. At least that's what I remember.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #6  
duneslider's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Riverton, Utah
Default

I think the 4.7 is closer in relation to the magnum engines, 5.9 and 5.2. I personally like the engine and thought it was very responsive. Not a huge power maker but better than the 3.8
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 06:14 PM
  #7  
brian361us's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: West Jefferson, North Carolina, United States
Default

I have owned four trucks with the 4.7 in them and was pleased with the motor. Why they never were put in the JK I have no idea.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 08:54 AM
  #8  
TROUPP's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Grover, pa
Default

It is electronically closer to what the magnum motors were.(4.7's that is). Hence the reason computer have been made available rather quickly for the hemi conversion, which is controlled more like the 3.8l.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 10:29 AM
  #9  
rws's Avatar
rws
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

Originally Posted by TROUPP
I believe the limiting factor is that the electronics on the 4.7 are not closely related to anything in the jeep.. And the hemi uses many of the same controls. I believe I saw a discussion on this once on aev's site. The hemi does need a special computer, but the 4.7 would need entire harnesses and custom gauges, as the canbus signals aren't compatible. At least that's what I remember.
Originally Posted by TROUPP
It is electronically closer to what the magnum motors were.(4.7's that is). Hence the reason computer have been made available rather quickly for the hemi conversion, which is controlled more like the 3.8l.
Figures!!! One of the best motors they've ever made and their AWFUL electronics don't work with one of their own motors.. Can't say I'm surprised as it took over 6 hours for my Jeep guy to get the HID's to work with the JK's system..
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #10  
07 JK "bullfrog"'s Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Wright City, Missouri
Default

Do the LS!! Just keep ur foot off the pedal lol. Guy here in Missouri had an LS1 in a jeep( TJ?) with Dana 60's and when he went thru a mud pit at the local mud run he made his gears look like a brake rotor. At 5,000 rpm and mid-pit he broke every tooth 5.38 gears. :crazyeyes!
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM.