Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

89 octane on 91 setting with flashpaq???

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #11  
Eugene the jeep's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO.
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
If you run shy on the octane fuel you are running as compared to the octane setting of the programmer, you will start to run up against the knock sensors and retard your timing. If you are retarding the timing, you are taking away the benefits of running the higher octane tune. This isn't to say that it won't work, as the PCM will correct A/F mixtures but it won't work optimally.

My preference is to always run at the Tunes octane or higher. I don't want to droop any of the advance and I don't want the problems associated with running lean.

The half and half method works fine although it is a pain in the ass. Personally I would just aim high and forget about it.

Lastly, in my opinion and with the winter months, I always fall back to the lowest octane tune. I know because of how much longer it takes to get to operating temperatures I'm going to see a 10% hit in fuel mileage. Lower temperatures also reduce octane requirements and lower octane levels create more heat. That's why engines tend to knock more in the summer.

In round numbers, a 20 degree drop in intake air temperature reduces your octane requirements by 1. Of course the PCM takes care of most of this, but why would I dump a high octane, slow burning fuel in my tank when I can get a hotter/faster burning low octane fuel to go along with the cold dense air?

That sounds reasonable. How about altitude? It stands to reason that with lower atmospheric pressure and the subsequent drop in compression, I should be able to run a lower octane fuel with a higher tune number without knocking. What are your thoughts on that?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #12  
JPop's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Eugene the jeep
That sounds reasonable. How about altitude? It stands to reason that with lower atmospheric pressure and the subsequent drop in compression, I should be able to run a lower octane fuel with a higher tune number without knocking. What are your thoughts on that?
Yep, I agree. In round numbers you should be able to drop about 1 octane per 2500 feet.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM.