Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

All terrain vs Mudders

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #1  
xldme's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: harlingen, tx
Default All terrain vs Mudders

I am currently running 325/60/18 (33.4 x 12.8) Mud terrains. I am thinking of going back to a 32-33 all terrain tire to improve handling and gas mileage. Do you think I will see a dramatic change in handling and gas mileage by doing this? Is is worth spending the money?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #2  
Wheelerbob's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 557
Likes: 1
From: Middle river, Md
Default

I'm wondering the same thing.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #3  
BaltChief's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 0
From: Catonsville, MD
Default

Your mileage will improve a little with the AT and a little more by cutting the width to say 11.5 or so. The ride will also improve and the noise level too. But I am not sure just how much.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #4  
SASQUATCH's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
From: The Deep Dark Woods of Texas!
Default

wow....and I wish my KM2s made more noise ....love they way the KM2s handle, better than most ATs I've ever used in my life. I still get 16mpg in the city with 35s.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #5  
Jose Dosil's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Sebring<FL
Default

I have the ProComp Xtreme A/T and think they work great both on road
and off road.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 01:40 PM
  #6  
xldme's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: harlingen, tx
Default

Originally Posted by SASQUATCH
wow....and I wish my KM2s made more noise ....love they way the KM2s handle, better than most ATs I've ever used in my life. I still get 16mpg in the city with 35s.
Is that 16mpg with engine mods? I get around 14 city with the engine stock, 17-18 hwy with a good tailwind.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 06:17 AM
  #7  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

you may notice a slight improvement with MPG but not much. I remember reading in one of the 4wd mags about mileage differences between an AT and MT in the same size. If I remember correctly, there was about 1/2 to 1 mpg difference, which really isn't that much.

So...at 15k miles/ year and 16mpg, that's 937 gallons/year. At $3.50/gallon, that's $3,279.

Say you change to AT's and gain 0.75 mpg, thats 895 gallons at $3,132, assuimg you actually gain 0.75 mpg.

That equals a savings of $147 a year (again, provided you actually see that gain and drive 15k miles/year)

So...it would take 4+ years to off set the cost of buying new ATs. By that time they are worn out and the whole thing is a wash.

Here's what you can do, send me your tiresand rims, and I'll send you mine. It won't cost you a dime and you will notice the improvement and savings imediately.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 07:16 AM
  #8  
Yamaha90's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 3
From: Amherst, Ohio
Default

wow nice one CJ7, well put. instead of all terrains i will get 33" KM2's...eventually
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #9  
xldme's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: harlingen, tx
Default

Originally Posted by CJ7nvrstk
you may notice a slight improvement with MPG but not much. I remember reading in one of the 4wd mags about mileage differences between an AT and MT in the same size. If I remember correctly, there was about 1/2 to 1 mpg difference, which really isn't that much.

So...at 15k miles/ year and 16mpg, that's 937 gallons/year. At $3.50/gallon, that's $3,279.

Say you change to AT's and gain 0.75 mpg, thats 895 gallons at $3,132, assuimg you actually gain 0.75 mpg.

That equals a savings of $147 a year (again, provided you actually see that gain and drive 15k miles/year)

So...it would take 4+ years to off set the cost of buying new ATs. By that time they are worn out and the whole thing is a wash.

Here's what you can do, send me your tiresand rims, and I'll send you mine. It won't cost you a dime and you will notice the improvement and savings imediately.
Thanks CJ7nvrstk you've convinced me to stop being a little bi*@*h and keep these.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 02:54 PM
  #10  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Damn! Was hoping for the trade.



Enjoy your MTs.

BTW, will be goin with MTs on my next tire purchase.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06 PM.