Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Currie Antirock Install question

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 09:09 PM
  #11  
Slow_but_Sure's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ronin2120
Hey no worries about asking questions thats what the forum is for, just glad I could help out. You probably have your rear sway bar still connected which will help limit the amount of body roll you have, thats why you didn't notice a difference. I am running anti-rock front and rear so I notice quite a bit more body roll. I would suggest taking your rear sway bar off and then driving around town to get a feel for it and then you could make adjustments if you like. Honestly looking at the angle of yours thats probably ideal for you, if you run neutral or negative angle you run the risk of the sway bar swinging around and impacting your front bumper if your flexing your suspension drastically.
Ok. Just played with the Jeep more today, and im feeling a difference with antirocks. I think they work. But so far i could only put hands in the city/highway driving. Can't wait to test it offroad. May do it this Sunday. I think im getting used to the angle i have, i was just a little frustrated yesterday after having a hard time figuiring out how to install it.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 10:35 PM
  #12  
ronin2120's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 1
From: Fort Lewis, WA
Default

For me the biggest benefit from going to this was the fact that I could just pull off theroad and hit the trail. I got to remove the electronic disconnect and I don't ever have to worry about shaking my rig or being on level ground to reconnect anything. Depending on the angle your set at you will lose a little bit of flex somewhere in the area of a half inch to one inch but to be honest I have never noticed.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 10:45 PM
  #13  
Slow_but_Sure's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ronin2120
For me the biggest benefit from going to this was the fact that I could just pull off theroad and hit the trail. I got to remove the electronic disconnect and I don't ever have to worry about shaking my rig or being on level ground to reconnect anything. Depending on the angle your set at you will lose a little bit of flex somewhere in the area of a half inch to one inch but to be honest I have never noticed.
Same here. I had JKS quick discos. Although it worked ok, i just didn't like the process of disconnecting and connecting. I always had a trouble getting them back because it would not level, so had to ask constantly someone to lean the body of one side or another. Big hustle.

Also, when completely disconnected, the body roll was just way too much.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 10:54 PM
  #14  
ronin2120's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 1
From: Fort Lewis, WA
Default

Yeah I have noticed with my antirock that the suspension acts a lot more predictable especially in the rocks, I haven't had the suspension just drop or flex out.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 04:59 AM
  #15  
Ringer's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Chardon, OH
Default

Originally Posted by ronin2120
For me the biggest benefit from going to this was the fact that I could just pull off theroad and hit the trail. I got to remove the electronic disconnect and I don't ever have to worry about shaking my rig or being on level ground to reconnect anything. Depending on the angle your set at you will lose a little bit of flex somewhere in the area of a half inch to one inch but to be honest I have never noticed.
You shouldn't lose much if any. With a 12" shock you won't lose any, and with a 14" shock you will lose 1/2".

To the OP. It looks fine, but take a look at trimming the body mount. It looks like you will contact it at full compression. I had to do this with mine. I have Antirocks front and rear, and love them. The jeep is very predictable on the trails.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 10:07 AM
  #16  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

[QUOTE=ronin2120;3832901]They look fine.

The higher the angle the less body roll you'll get.

How does the angle affect body roll? That makes absolutly no sense.
The amount of body roll you get will depend on the torsion bar twist rate and the length of the arms. The longer the arms the more leverage is placed on the torsion bar and increase twist (more body roll).

You can run them level and even pointed down a bit. You must look at the total travel of your suspension so at full droop you do not fully extend the arms strait down or the swar bar could potientally flip around forward and lock up your steering and likely damage your links.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 08:28 PM
  #17  
ronin2120's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 1
From: Fort Lewis, WA
Default

I'm no expert and maybe I'm way off base with this but if the arms are pointed up (lengthing the links) and your making a turn wouldn't the bar engage sooner creating more resistance thus tightening sooner therefore limiting your bodyroll more then if they were neutral or pointed down?

[QUOTE=TheDirtman;3834144]
Originally Posted by ronin2120
They look fine.

The higher the angle the less body roll you'll get.

How does the angle affect body roll? That makes absolutly no sense.
The amount of body roll you get will depend on the torsion bar twist rate and the length of the arms. The longer the arms the more leverage is placed on the torsion bar and increase twist (more body roll).

You can run them level and even pointed down a bit. You must look at the total travel of your suspension so at full droop you do not fully extend the arms strait down or the swar bar could potientally flip around forward and lock up your steering and likely damage your links.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 08:37 PM
  #18  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

Length of the links should not affect the amount of resistance. Where you mount the top of the link on the arm is how you adjust the tension. The farther out you mount the links the lighter the resistance.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 11:34 PM
  #19  
ronin2120's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 1
From: Fort Lewis, WA
Default

Thanks for the info Dirtman

I didn't get the adjustable arms for the front on my set-up but assumed that by adjusting the links you could achieve some tunablity. I realize that I wouldn't get the same if I had the adjustable arms but I figured you'd get some.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 04:47 AM
  #20  
Offroad_Elements's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 2
From: South East MA
Default

I installed the front Antirock on my JK a few days ago, I set to 15 degrees and it was about right for my down travel (4-6" Bilsteins).

Ended up going with the pretty Antirocks
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image-247198134.jpg
Views:	905
Size:	82.9 KB
ID:	530824   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1160154349.jpg
Views:	339
Size:	89.1 KB
ID:	530825   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-622438903.jpg
Views:	329
Size:	70.3 KB
ID:	530826  
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 PM.