Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

First experience with Cepek FC-II in snow

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 27, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #11  
NH-JK's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 2
From: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Default

Try the good year dura tracks if your looking for a good snow/ice tire.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #12  
Venom19's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Andover, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by mostlystock

No - they're at about 38 PSI. These are load range D, with a max rating of 80 PSI, and during the summer I had them at about 30 and they seemed very sluggish. Boosted them to 35 and eventually 38 towards fall, as I was pulling a 3,300 lb trailer with no weight distribution hitch, so big load on the rears. Mileage and responsiveness improved dramatically when I had them at 38. I haven't aired them down at all since then, so they're probably a little too high for the snow. I'll drop it down and see what happens - good point.

ESP automagically disengages in low range. Definitely off. Airing down should be an easy test.
Way too high psi, I ran 28 in the 2 feet of snow we had in NJ today, no issues at all w my 09 2 door X w Rubi tires and ESP off! Blasted through huge drifts all day, even made it up very steep unplowed driveway.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2010 | 07:55 PM
  #13  
db09JKU's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Default

Originally Posted by mostlystock

No - they're at about 38 PSI. These are load range D, with a max rating of 80 PSI, and during the summer I had them at about 30 and they seemed very sluggish. Boosted them to 35 and eventually 38 towards fall, as I was pulling a 3,300 lb trailer with no weight distribution hitch, so big load on the rears. Mileage and responsiveness improved dramatically when I had them at 38. I haven't aired them down at all since then, so they're probably a little too high for the snow. I'll drop it down and see what happens - good point.

ESP automagically disengages in low range. Definitely off. Airing down should be an easy test.
Yep in 4-lo it does but you did say you lost momentum in 4-hi though and then you dropped it down. Was thinking it might have been engaging in 4-hi.

Last edited by db09JKU; Dec 27, 2010 at 07:58 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 04:52 AM
  #14  
winkelhawk's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Bohemia, NY
Default

Originally Posted by mostlystock
What PSI do you run?

I've heard other comments about these being better in the snow than the MFG Mud Terrain.
Usually around 30-35 psi on the FCII. I have the 265/75/16's E load. I had them between 35-40 and I did not like the way they rode. The wear great considering I never rotated them. I know, not the best thing to do. I got about 30K before needing to replace the front one's. They are also great on the beach, since that is the most off roading you can legally do on Long Island.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #15  
mostlystock's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Default

Originally Posted by winkelhawk
Usually around 30-35 psi on the FCII. I have the 265/75/16's E load. I had them between 35-40 and I did not like the way they rode
I completely agree. It took me about 6 months of driving with 35-38 PSI to realize I needed ti drop the pressure. I think I needed to ride with them at the higher pressures for a while to get used to the feel. Too stuff, and jeep seemed to skip and bounce over bumps.

Dropped to about 30.5 now, what a difference. Ride is smoother, yet not too sluggish, and I no longer feel every bump I hit.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 04:31 PM
  #16  
Enzo's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 1
From: Howard Beach, NY
Default

That is one nice looking tire, I saw it live a few days ago for the first time.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2011 | 05:31 PM
  #17  
mostlystock's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Default

Originally Posted by Enzo
That is one nice looking tire, I saw it live a few days ago for the first time.
I assume you're referring to the Cepek FC II, not the Duratrac (which was also mentioned in this thread). Either way, I think both are really good looking tires.

Must say I've been very pleased with the Cepek FC II's overall. Got stuck in snow a couple times but mainly because I was buried down to axle & differential housing height, and also not aired down much. They do quite well in snow overall. I'm about to do an axle gear change (4.10 to 4.88) and plan to go from the 32" Cepek FC II's to a 33" tire at the same time. I'm very tempted to stay with the Cepeks. The Duratracs are a possibility but I'd like to move from load range E down to D, and the Duratracts in 33" are E, whereas Cepeks in 33" are D.

But back to your original point - yes, it's a good looking tire. Mildly aggressive.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:30 PM.