Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

least amount of lift for 37's?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
leski's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: texas
Default least amount of lift for 37's?

Well the title pretty much says it all what is the least amount of lift i can have and still put 37's on it?? i was thinking 2.5" coil lift and 1" M.O.R.E. body lift but what do i know.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
-MAW-'s Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
From: MONTREAL; CANADA
Default

Check out neoxxis profile

He's got 37s
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:58 PM
  #3  
Evolution's Avatar
Sponsoring Vendor
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 1
From: Fullerton CA
Default

37s with no lift!
Running 37s and lift height really depends on what ride quality you are looking for? how much up travel you desire? and if you mind rubbing of cutting fenders ?

Its like a fat guy in speedo's just cause it fits don't make it right.....
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 10:07 PM
  #4  
JCKnauer22's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Middle River, MD
Default

LMAO! i love EVO's response! but yeah, 37's are attainable with the 2.5" lift and 1" bl, but you'll likely need to trim your fenders or go to aftermarket flats as well. you may still have some rubbing offroad but i'm not 100% sure. i know planman knows the ins and outs of this process, so maybe he'll chime in and give the specifics. i too am interested in hearing the verdict here
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 03:22 AM
  #5  
jeepnick's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Default

im running 37's and a 3.5. dont know that i would suggest being any lower. i have bushwacker flares and will prob need to trim them before i wheel. i like the look with this set up
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 04:15 AM
  #6  
redrockin7's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster County, PA
Default

Mopar fit 40s on the "Lower 40" concept with no lift, correct? So, basically, anything is attainable, but you'll need to cut corners or make modifications other places, the less lift you go with. Things such as flat fenders required, maybe trimming of sheetmetal seems, etc.

A 3.5" and some flats would probably be a good combo, as has been suggested. Otherwise (if you want to remain stock fenders and don't trim much) you probably want a little more than that even? 3.5" with 1" BL or one of the 4" premium lift kits (AEV?).
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 05:10 AM
  #7  
joneszj's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Default

Originally Posted by Evolution
37s with no lift!
Running 37s and lift height really depends on what ride quality you are looking for? how much up travel you desire? and if you mind rubbing of cutting fenders ?

Its like a fat guy in speedo's just cause it fits don't make it right.....
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 18, 2010 | 06:01 AM
  #8  
TEEJ's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 5
From: Lawrenceville, NJ
Talking

LOL

Good responses.



I think the point made about the concept of "Fit" being variable is a good one.

For example, if all of your TIRE clearance is via a suspension lift, where does that extra room go when you compress the suspension, say going over a rock or a bump, braking, cornering, etc?

Is it going to go to the same place that the lap of the fat man sitting in his in the speedo went when he stood up?

I think it will.



Adding a 1" BL for example means that you just made room for a 2" larger diameter tire...

...so, essentially, if a 35" tire were to clear the wells with a given amount of lift, the 37" tire would clear with the same amount of lift and a 1" BL.

It would also mean that with a 2" BL, you gain enough room for a 4" larger diameter tire than you would with no BL....

...So with a 2" BL, you could fit 37" diameter tires with the lift that would have allowed 33" tires....


....and so forth.

So, essentially, if ALL you want is TIRE clearance, the BL is the most cost effective solution, shy of a sawzall, flatties, etc. (IE: Comparing SL to BL only...)

If you ALSO want the option of more articulation, ground clearance for the frame (Over the clearance provided by the larger tires...), etc...then an SL works for you too....but, you need MORE SL to get the same TIRE clearance as a BL, except at ride height, where its giving you the same thing.

Hope that helps to clarify this a bit!

Reply
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #9  
Evolution's Avatar
Sponsoring Vendor
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 1
From: Fullerton CA
Default

Originally Posted by TEEJ
LOL

Good responses.



I think the point made about the concept of "Fit" being variable is a good one.

For example, if all of your TIRE clearance is via a suspension lift, where does that extra room go when you compress the suspension, say going over a rock or a bump, braking, cornering, etc?

Is it going to go to the same place that the lap of the fat man sitting in his in the speedo went when he stood up?

I think it will.



Adding a 1" BL for example means that you just made room for a 2" larger diameter tire...

...so, essentially, if a 35" tire were to clear the wells with a given amount of lift, the 37" tire would clear with the same amount of lift and a 1" BL.

It would also mean that with a 2" BL, you gain enough room for a 4" larger diameter tire than you would with no BL....

...So with a 2" BL, you could fit 37" diameter tires with the lift that would have allowed 33" tires....


....and so forth.

So, essentially, if ALL you want is TIRE clearance, the BL is the most cost effective solution, shy of a sawzall, flatties, etc. (IE: Comparing SL to BL only...)

If you ALSO want the option of more articulation, ground clearance for the frame (Over the clearance provided by the larger tires...), etc...then an SL works for you too....but, you need MORE SL to get the same TIRE clearance as a BL, except at ride height, where its giving you the same thing.

Hope that helps to clarify this a bit!

funny and good points
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 08:01 AM
  #10  
Evolution's Avatar
Sponsoring Vendor
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 1
From: Fullerton CA
Default

GREAT candidate for EVO rock stars get more ground clearance and usable wheel travel ...
The pic shows you are not using at least 1.5 inches of shock shaft.....

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 AM.