My performance gains from superchips and 5.38's
Thought i would post something a bit more positive about my latest upgrades. For those of you who havent read my latest thread i am trying to get a driveline vibration pin pointed after i had my 5.38's installed.
4 door rubi, 35 mud grapplers, auto, 3.5 lift
Anyways
stock 0-60 time was 13.3 average
superchips on 93 tune plus k&n filter average 12.3
added the 5.38's and im down to a 10.8!
Thats almost a 20 % percent decrease in 0-60 time. Pretty good for $1575.00
Oh and before everyone starts on how jeeps are not supposed to be fast i know. i dont race my jeep around! I do think that 0-60 times are a good way for most people to evaluate improvements in power.
4 door rubi, 35 mud grapplers, auto, 3.5 lift
Anyways
stock 0-60 time was 13.3 average
superchips on 93 tune plus k&n filter average 12.3
added the 5.38's and im down to a 10.8!
Thats almost a 20 % percent decrease in 0-60 time. Pretty good for $1575.00

Oh and before everyone starts on how jeeps are not supposed to be fast i know. i dont race my jeep around! I do think that 0-60 times are a good way for most people to evaluate improvements in power.
What I found interesting was my 0-70 time was a 10th of a second faster using the Tow Tune than the Performance Tune. On the Tow Tune I had 15.43 seconds. On the Performance Tune I had 15.53 seconds. The tests were performed with 93 octane gas within a few minutes of each other. The Tow Tune also seems to run better in my rig. I have tried them all and always fall back to the Tow Tune.
Also can you elaborate on your tests a bit? Did you brake-torque to get up on the converter at launch or was it just from idle?
Really? You don't think igniting the mixture earlier (even MORE before Top Dead Center) increases cylinder pressure?
Trending Topics
My JK is slightly different than ARM2004's. I have 5:13 gears, Automatic, MBRP Exhaust and a drop in K&N. I don't have 0-60 times, but I did a similar test using the 0-70 Data Acquisition capture in Superchips.
What I found interesting was my 0-70 time was a 10th of a second faster using the Tow Tune than the Performance Tune. On the Tow Tune I had 15.43 seconds. On the Performance Tune I had 15.53 seconds. The tests were performed with 93 octane gas within a few minutes of each other. The Tow Tune also seems to run better in my rig. I have tried them all and always fall back to the Tow Tune.
What I found interesting was my 0-70 time was a 10th of a second faster using the Tow Tune than the Performance Tune. On the Tow Tune I had 15.43 seconds. On the Performance Tune I had 15.53 seconds. The tests were performed with 93 octane gas within a few minutes of each other. The Tow Tune also seems to run better in my rig. I have tried them all and always fall back to the Tow Tune.
My posted times are 5 run averages. There was a 10th of a second difference or more in alot of my runs. So unless your gains from tow tune to 93 tune are based on averages i wouldnt consider them very acurate.
It's going to increase cylinder temp by a little bit *maybe*. Do you really think Jeep retarded the timing enough to improve power so much that cylinder pressures are high enough to warrant 93 octane? Come on. That's ridiculous. I don't think there would EVER be any pre detonation on stock compression with a naturally aspirated engine, none the less 93 octane. You can run 12 PSI on that kind of octane...even non-inter-cooled IIRC. It's ridiculous that a degree or two of timing would require the highest octane pump gas available. IF they are even getting 1 degree out of it.



