Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

rk 2.5 or 3.5

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 04:17 PM
  #21  
Mcgee149's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: Bakerfield
Default

That is exactly what I want right there. That is perfect!
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #22  
project06tj's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Erie, PA
Default

I'm not sure why so many people say that the 3.5" is better for the 4 door on 35's. I have the 2.5" on my 4 door and I'd say I gained closer to 4" up front. How mine sits now on 35's with the 2.5" and cut flares, it almost looks too high for the tires. With more pinch seam trimming in the rear, 37's would clear no problem. I'd say if you're only running 35's, with cut flares or not, the RK 2.5 is plenty high.

Click image for larger version

Name:	photo 1 (1).jpg
Views:	148
Size:	37.1 KB
ID:	371410Click image for larger version

Name:	photo 2 (1).jpg
Views:	164
Size:	38.4 KB
ID:	371411
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 05:01 PM
  #23  
finfreeze's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Rifle, Co
Default

Originally Posted by project06tj
I'm not sure why so many people say that the 3.5" is better for the 4 door on 35's. I have the 2.5" on my 4 door and I'd say I gained closer to 4" up front. How mine sits now on 35's with the 2.5" and cut flares, it almost looks too high for the tires. With more pinch seam trimming in the rear, 37's would clear no problem. I'd say if you're only running 35's, with cut flares or not, the RK 2.5 is plenty high.

<img src="https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=371410"/><img src="https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=371411"/>
I understand what you are saying. My fenders are staying whole until I get 37's.
This is my first jk so I went with the better safe than sorry method as far as height and couldn't be happier unless I had coilovers.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 05:08 PM
  #24  
bbreen24's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Default

I went with the 3.5" and couldnt be happier. Im running 315/70/17's and have plenty of room for 37's, just need to trim the pinch seam. I had a Teraflex 2.5" on my 08 and it just seemed to small. I know its only an inch but the 3.5 simply looks better to me. I got about 4 1/4 in front and 3.5 in the back.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 05:17 PM
  #25  
Mcgee149's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: Bakerfield
Default

Id like to thank all of you for posting but I am in a two door so I can understand why you guys in the four doors like the 3.5. I know if I was in a four door I would do the 3.5 also.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 05:19 PM
  #26  
Mcgee149's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: Bakerfield
Default

And like I said I will not purchase anything but rock krawler
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 05:24 PM
  #27  
JHP81's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Mission Valley, San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Mcgee149
That is exactly what I want right there. That is perfect!
exactly... 2.5 for 2 dr is just right.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 07:45 PM
  #28  
Mcgee149's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: Bakerfield
Default

Any 2.5s flexed to the max I'm talkin like three wheel motion
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:39 PM.