Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Spidertrax wheel spacers ?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 02:06 PM
  #11  
TURTLECON's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 3
From: REDONDO BEACH, CA
Default

Originally Posted by jadmt
while I have not confirmed this a direct competitor of Spidertax says that the new rubicon rims have a void in the backside so the studs do not interfere with a solid fit and do not have to be cut down. Anybody have a 13-14 rubicon rim that they can look and see on?
A void? What on earth are you talking about?
There's a reason why 1.5" is widely used. I've never heard of any spidertrax issues with any stock JK wheel, including the new styles. I don't understand why the studs would ever need to be cut down to fit either the Moab or Rubicon wheel. I had spidertrax on my 2008 18" Sahara Moab wheels and again on my 2013 Rubicon now.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #12  
jadmt's Avatar
JK Jedi
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 107
From: missoula,mt
Default

Originally Posted by JK-FREAK
A void? What on earth are you talking about?
There's a reason why 1.5" is widely used. I've never heard of any spidertrax issues with any stock JK wheel, including the new styles. I don't understand why the studs would ever need to be cut down to fit either the Moab or Rubicon wheel. I had spidertrax on my 2008 18" Sahara Moab wheels and again on my 2013 Rubicon now.
I don't want to use 1.5" because I want more backspace then stock rim with 1.5" spacer ie I am wanting 5" total backspace not 4.5" or 4.75". For your information Spidertrax confirmed that there was indeed a void on the backside of the new rubicon rims so you can use spacers less then 1.5" without any modifications to your stock wheel studs. Rims void of this void lol would indeed need at least a 1.5" spacer but apparently new rubicon rims don't. The reason Spidertrax gave for not going less then 1.5" is because it is hit or miss on the various other jeep rims whether or not they have this void.

I guess you would have to read post 8 and 9 to understand my post 10
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 04:02 PM
  #13  
planman's Avatar
Forum Tech Advisor
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 11
From: Billings, MT
Default

Teraflex makes a steel, hub centric 1.25" thick spacer that requires most people to cut the ends off the wheel studs.

Why would you want 5" net backspacing?

The largest tires you could run would be 33s, and you could not run a lift with longer rear swaybar links in the stock position.

If 33s are your goal, why run wheel spacers at all?

If your goal is 35s, 5" net backspacing will restrict your turning radius, or the tires will rub on the control arms and the swaybar on a full lock turn.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 04:26 PM
  #14  
jadmt's Avatar
JK Jedi
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 107
From: missoula,mt
Default

Originally Posted by planman
Teraflex makes a steel, hub centric 1.25" thick spacer that requires most people to cut the ends off the wheel studs.

Why would you want 5" net backspacing?

The largest tires you could run would be 33s, and you could not run a lift with longer rear swaybar links in the stock position.

If 33s are your goal, why run wheel spacers at all?

If your goal is 35s, 5" net backspacing will restrict your turning radius, or the tires will rub on the control arms and the swaybar on a full lock turn.
AEV rims have 5.2" backspacing and have no issues running 35's. I like how ~5" backspacing looks and I plan on running 285/75-17's (just over 33" actual). Both Spidertrax and BORA have now told me that the new rubicon rims do have a pocket on the backside so the studs do not have to be cut. I plan on trying them without spacers to begin with and am going with either a AEV 2" lift or teraflex 1.5" lift.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 04:58 PM
  #15  
planman's Avatar
Forum Tech Advisor
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 11
From: Billings, MT
Default

Their 5.2" backspaced wheels are for 33s.

They have had 4.63" backspaced wheels for 35s.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 05:23 PM
  #16  
jadmt's Avatar
JK Jedi
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 107
From: missoula,mt
Default

Originally Posted by planman
Their 5.2" backspaced wheels are for 33s.

They have had 4.63" backspaced wheels for 35s.
I was over at their shop a while back(I drive by their R&D shop every day) and they said the backspace on the Pintlers and savgres were 5.2" and they had 35's on them. I suppose I could have misunderstood. I also looked on their website and they do not indicate there is a different wheel for 33's vs 35's. Not trying to be difficult I just want to make sure I am getting this right. I like how the tires stay inside the fender flares is why I stopped to ask what backspacing they were running on their rims.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 05:29 PM
  #17  
kh202's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 2
From: Rockwood, TN
Default

Originally Posted by jadmt
I was over at their shop a while back(I drive by their R&D shop every day) and they said the backspace on the Pintlers and savgres were 5.2" and they had 35's on them. I suppose I could have misunderstood. I also looked on their website and they do not indicate there is a different wheel for 33's vs 35's. Not trying to be difficult I just want to make sure I am getting this right. I like how the tires stay inside the fender flares is why I stopped to ask what backspacing they were running on their rims.
Just FYI, keeping tires inside the fenders means less stability on and off-road. I love the way my 35's on 3.75" BS feels
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 05:32 PM
  #18  
RND's Avatar
RND
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Westfield, Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by planman
Teraflex makes a steel, hub centric 1.25" thick spacer that requires most people to cut the ends off the wheel studs. Why would you want 5" net backspacing? The largest tires you could run would be 33s, and you could not run a lift with longer rear swaybar links in the stock position. If 33s are your goal, why run wheel spacers at all? If your goal is 35s, 5" net backspacing will restrict your turning radius, or the tires will rub on the control arms and the swaybar on a full lock turn.
A 285- 305 tire does NOT rub on control arms or sway bar on full lock with 5" net backspacing.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 05:34 PM
  #19  
RND's Avatar
RND
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Westfield, Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by planman
Their 5.2" backspaced wheels are for 33s. They have had 4.63" backspaced wheels for 35s.
AEV does not make a 4.63" back spaced wheel.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #20  
TxRdStr's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Weatherford, OK
Default

Originally Posted by jadmt
AEV rims have 5.2" backspacing and have no issues running 35's. I like how ~5" backspacing looks and I plan on running 285/75-17's (just over 33" actual). Both Spidertrax and BORA have now told me that the new rubicon rims do have a pocket on the backside so the studs do not have to be cut. I plan on trying them without spacers to begin with and am going with either a AEV 2" lift or teraflex 1.5" lift.
Treaddepot.com on 285/75-17 toyo open country. Section Width: 11.30" Overall Diameter: 33.90"
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 PM.