Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Stiff Riding in JKU

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 14, 2023 | 06:44 AM
  #11  
Junkyard junkie's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 150
Likes: 20
From: White Rock, NM.
Default

I would suggest the FOX 2.0.
I have them on my JKUR with a 2.5" Tera flex lift. I would say the ride quality is better than stock.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2023 | 11:19 AM
  #12  
XJRefugee's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 265
Likes: 80
From: fountain hills, arizona
Default

So you noticed rough riding after the gear swap? but you already had many miles on those 35" tires correct? did your lift include adjustable control arms especially for the forward lower . Non- adjustable control arms on your 3-3.5" lift might contribute to the rough ride feel however you have had the lift on for years so this is just a recent turn for the worse. I would agree with those who say your shocks are probably shot
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2023 | 12:41 PM
  #13  
hscumbie's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Newton, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by XJRefugee
So you noticed rough riding after the gear swap? but you already had many miles on those 35" tires correct? did your lift include adjustable control arms especially for the forward lower . Non- adjustable control arms on your 3-3.5" lift might contribute to the rough ride feel however you have had the lift on for years so this is just a recent turn for the worse. I would agree with those who say your shocks are probably shot
No, the rough riding has been around for a while now. It was just until recently that I noticed it seemed worse than other jeeps with similar setups.

I forgot to indicate, but I did install geometry correction brackets for the swingarm positioning. I did that a few years back and it made a big difference. However, it's still pretty rough all things considered. I did dial my tire pressure in to about 26 PSI before a weekend trip and got much better shock absorption with good tire tread contact.

I believe the next best thing is to move forward with new shocks. I'm currently in college, so I'm trying to be considerate of how much I spend. I've been seeing that the Bilstein 5100 shocks and Fox 2.0 shocks are the go-to's for replacements. I'm leaning towards the Bilsteins from a cost perspective, but I've also heard that the Fox 2.0 ride softer. Would anyone say that the Fox 2.0 are worth the extra cost over the Bilsteins?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2023 | 05:31 PM
  #14  
resharp001's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,360
Likes: 2,089
From: Willow Park, TX
Default

I would say both of those shocks are actually pretty stiff IMO. I'm not sure either of those will help what you think is already a rough ride. I've had FOX 2.0 monotubes and currently have 2.0 reservoirs. The lengths are just perfect for my build moreso than I just love those shocks. I've had friends with Bilsteins in the past and they were very similar. With budget in focus, I can't say the Fox are worth more. That said, you see Junkyard Junkie and I have differing opinions on the same shock. This is the kinda thing that is just going to be subjective from person to person. Keep in mind when you see opinions, people could also have the same brand shocks tuned differently for specific lifts that are sold with those particular shocks. It's not always apples to apples comparisons.

I'd also agree with JJ above....if you got E rated tires, that is the main crux of the issue....even if aired down a good bit.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2023 | 09:18 AM
  #15  
hscumbie's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Newton, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by resharp001
I would say both of those shocks are actually pretty stiff IMO. I'm not sure either of those will help what you think is already a rough ride. I've had FOX 2.0 monotubes and currently have 2.0 reservoirs. The lengths are just perfect for my build moreso than I just love those shocks. I've had friends with Bilsteins in the past and they were very similar. With budget in focus, I can't say the Fox are worth more. That said, you see Junkyard Junkie and I have differing opinions on the same shock. This is the kinda thing that is just going to be subjective from person to person. Keep in mind when you see opinions, people could also have the same brand shocks tuned differently for specific lifts that are sold with those particular shocks. It's not always apples to apples comparisons.

I'd also agree with JJ above....if you got E rated tires, that is the main crux of the issue....even if aired down a good bit.
Yeah, that seems to be the recurring theme. E rated tires are really just good for off-roading and that seems to be about it (other than longevity on the road). It looks like i'll have a hard time finding D or C rated tires since i'm running 18" wheels.

I would think i'll be due for new tires within the year probably (these have about 50,000 miles on them). What are some good tires you guys would recommend replacing with? I'm wanting to swap back to M/Ts for the more aggressive look. I used to run Nitto Trail Grapplers, but they were heavy as all getout compared to the KO2s (same size and width). I know M/Ts aren't designed for MPG, but I'm sure there are lighter M/Ts out there with nice tread patterns.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2023 | 04:37 PM
  #16  
Sixty4x4's Avatar
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 509
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Default

Just wanted to chime in and say - in Canada at least - E rated tires are like finding hens teeth. No 285 or 315-70/17 tires exist up here in C. A few in D but the rest are E. Is the industry going to change as I don't want to go buy 15" which C's have a better selection in that diameter. Not sure why this is so as the total Jeep Wrangelr units sold must be in the 100's of thousands across North America.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2023 | 04:34 PM
  #17  
mr.travo's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 5
Likes: 1
From: Montana
Default

I have the same issue with my 33’s. I am going 35’s this summer and finding a load range D is becoming a problem. Never used to have this problem before, what happened to the tire industry???
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 10:16 AM
  #18  
Jeff Pillsworth's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 147
Likes: 40
From: Ontario
Default

I have a set of Nitto Trail Grapplers 35x11.5/17 LOAD Range C on order, they should be in in Late March to replace my BFG KO2 35x12.5/17 Load Range E. In my research I also saw that Toyo had the OC AT3 in the 35x11.5 load C, and General Grabber X3 comes in a load C
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 02:27 PM
  #19  
Junkyard junkie's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 150
Likes: 20
From: White Rock, NM.
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff Pillsworth
I have a set of Nitto Trail Grapplers 35x11.5/17 LOAD Range C on order, they should be in in Late March to replace my BFG KO2 35x12.5/17 Load Range E. In my research I also saw that Toyo had the OC AT3 in the 35x11.5 load C, and General Grabber X3 comes in a load C
Interesting. I didn't know that 35 or 37x11.50 was even an option. Will likely go that route when it's time for a change.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM.