Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Question. Will a slightly larger tire give me a slight boost in mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 17, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #1  
spartan99's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 6
From: bay area, ca
Default Question. Will a slightly larger tire give me a slight boost in mileage?

Stock 3.73 auto JKU X. I'm thinking that a larger tire would allows the rpm's to spin at a lower rpm, right? Thus, wouldn't that give me better mileage? But, a larger tire means less torque at the wheels, which hurt mileage, right? Hmmm...

Just wondering what a slightly larger tire would do. Thoughts?
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:12 AM
  #2  
MOJEEP's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

It's always been the opposite for me. Larger tires = less MPG. I see your logic and understand that your not wanting to go much bigger but again I have never had luck with this.
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:16 AM
  #3  
spartan99's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 6
From: bay area, ca
Default

Yeah that's what I figured. The loss in turque outweighs the gear ratios.
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #4  
RevyJKU08's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,730
Likes: 3
From: BC
Default

Originally Posted by spartan99
Yeah that's what I figured. The loss in turque outweighs the gear ratios.
Also, bigger tires usually weigh more as well. so loss of MPG again.
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #5  
AK4Dave's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 0
From: Kenai Peninsula, Alaska
Default

Originally Posted by TripleJeep_99
Also, bigger tires usually weigh more as well. so loss of MPG again.
Exactly, more weight, less mpgs. Now if you could find a larger tire that weighs less, things might be different....hard to say.
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:40 AM
  #6  
robin's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 3
From: slp. Mexico
Default

I wouldn't think so........
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #7  
GoodysGotaCuda's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 1
From: Denton, TX
Default

You are walking the line between engine load and rpm. lower rpm doesnt mean thats where the engine is most efficicent and may require more fuel to hold the same rpm. extra rotating mass doesnt help either.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 PM.