Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Shock boots? Run em or no?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 22, 2012 | 05:36 AM
  #1  
jeepwave's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Default Shock boots? Run em or no?

So I just purchased the 3.5 Aev premium lift kit for my 09 jku and I'm fairly sure the billsteins on that lift come with shock boots. I could be wrong...but anyway, most guys I've seen around here don't run them. Some do.

I'm assuming he argument is that dirt and mud wont be getting in the seal of the shock. Do you run em? Would you recommend running em?

All in all, yes I will be doing a bit of offroading (1-2 times a week) but I really like the look without the boot.

Thoughts?
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 05:40 AM
  #2  
wayoflife's Avatar
JK-Forum Founder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 16
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

being that you're up in canada, i definitely would NOT run them. mud, water, salt dirt and gunk will get caught inside the boot and allow it to sit against the shock shaft for extended periods of time. this WILL cause the shaft to rust and ultimately ruin the shock.
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 06:17 AM
  #3  
EK's JK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

WOL, what about in Alabama? I am getting some 5100's in a couple of days and would like to run them without the boot. What do ya' think? BTW, some light wheeling (1-2 times/month). Thanks
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 06:22 AM
  #4  
wayoflife's Avatar
JK-Forum Founder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 16
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

Originally Posted by EK's JK
WOL, what about in Alabama? I am getting some 5100's in a couple of days and would like to run them without the boot. What do ya' think? BTW, some light wheeling (1-2 times/month). Thanks
i personally never like to run boots.
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 06:37 AM
  #5  
ReconJeep's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh,NC
Default

Originally Posted by wayoflife
being that you're up in canada, i definitely would NOT run them. mud, water, salt dirt and gunk will get caught inside the boot and allow it to sit against the shock shaft for extended periods of time. this WILL cause the shaft to rust and ultimately ruin the shock.
What he said. They accumulate debris which then scratches your shafts, which in turn damages the seals, and your shocks leak.


"Ex Umbris Venimus"

Sent from my iPhone

Last edited by ReconJeep; May 22, 2012 at 08:23 AM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 08:05 AM
  #6  
jeepwave's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by wayoflife
being that you're up in canada, i definitely would NOT run them. mud, water, salt dirt and gunk will get caught inside the boot and allow it to sit against the shock shaft for extended periods of time. this WILL cause the shaft to rust and ultimately ruin the shock.
Perfect. Great advice. Can always count on this forum! Thanks man. No boot it is!
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
EK's JK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Awesome info, thanks! I also like the look of no boot but was worried that it would void the Bilstein warranty.
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
yo_marc's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 1
From: Attleboro, MA
Default

Every stock vehicle that I can think of runs shock boots from the factory -- The argument could be made that they protect the junk from getting there in the first place, and, exposed shock shafts will constantly be subjected to salt, road grime, etc. etc.

For anything but dry weather driving, I would run boots.
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 09:48 AM
  #9  
Jeep(NV)'s Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Reno
Default

Originally Posted by yo_marc
Every stock vehicle that I can think of runs shock boots from the factory -- The argument could be made that they protect the junk from getting there in the first place, and, exposed shock shafts will constantly be subjected to salt, road grime, etc. etc.

For anything but dry weather driving, I would run boots.
The boots on my bilstines trapped water and mud in them! Your better off running without them. The problem is that the boots supplied with the bilstines are junk, now the boots on the stock rubi shocks do there job well and don't trap water in them.

Last edited by Jeep(NV); May 22, 2012 at 09:51 AM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 10:13 AM
  #10  
mjones's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Dela Where?
Default

I ran Ranchos with boots on my YJ in the the mid atlantic region. replaced two times due to pitting and seal leakage. The boots would ooze all the time after wheeling or heavy rains. I have run my bilsteins without boots and the shafts still look good. I spray them with fresh water to rinse them off each time i wash the car like i do to the undercariage as well. Run without the boots is my .02
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 AM.