Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

285 70 r17 bfg ta ko on stock 2013 unlimited rubicon

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 05:26 PM
  #1  
mannyjr22's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: United States
Cool 285 70 r17 bfg ta ko on stock 2013 unlimited rubicon

could you fit 285 70 r17 bfg ta ko on stock 2013 unlimited rubicon wheels?
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 05:31 PM
  #2  
Rich6700's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 717
Likes: 2
From: Glenside Pa
Default

Yep, no problem.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 06:00 PM
  #3  
money546's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Nashvegas, TN
Default

Not to hijack this thread...but I've been wondering the exact same thing and I'm curious about a follow up question. How different in size are the BFGs in this configuration as compared to the stock SRAs (or BFG MTs)?

I'm not sure I understand the tire ratio piece, and which dimension changes as you go from 255/75 to the size we're talkin here.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 02:52 AM
  #4  
olyelr's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 769
Likes: 3
From: Elk Rapids, MI
Default

Originally Posted by money546
Not to hijack this thread...but I've been wondering the exact same thing and I'm curious about a follow up question. How different in size are the BFGs in this configuration as compared to the stock SRAs (or BFG MTs)?

I'm not sure I understand the tire ratio piece, and which dimension changes as you go from 255/75 to the size we're talkin here.

The first number is the width of the tire in MM, and the second number is the aspect ratio (sidewall height) - which is the percentage of the width. To get converted into inches, just divide by 25.4 (that is how many MM there are in one inch).

So, a 255/75/17 should be right around 32x10 (255 divided by 25.4 is basically 10" , which is the width - 75% of 10" is 7.5", which is the sidewall hieght - 7.5" x 2 is 15" of total sidewall - plus the 17" rim equals a total hieght of 32". Confusing yet?

Soooo, a 255/75/17 is 32x10, and a 285/70/17 is 32.7x11.2 - within reason.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 04:12 AM
  #5  
money546's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Nashvegas, TN
Default

It is a little confusing by nature...but you really cleared up the math. Thanks for that!

The only part I don't get is how a 10" wide tire and an 11.2" wide tire fit on the same width stock rim. I guess the bead is in the same spot, but the profile flares out further at the treads?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 07:53 AM
  #6  
DCOX27's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Savannah Ga
Default

to add to this question would you need a different tire carrier on the back for this larger tire?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
olyelr's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 769
Likes: 3
From: Elk Rapids, MI
Default

Originally Posted by money546
It is a little confusing by nature...but you really cleared up the math. Thanks for that!

The only part I don't get is how a 10" wide tire and an 11.2" wide tire fit on the same width stock rim. I guess the bead is in the same spot, but the profile flares out further at the treads?
Yep, you got it.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 09:03 PM
  #8  
Delux2769's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
From: Quinlan, TX
Default

Here is my Jeep with Stock 17" wheels and 285/70/17 BFG A/T KO tires.

Granted, I do have Rough Country's 1.5" spacers. Had them since i had the stock SRA tires on it.

You do not need a tire carrier for this small of a tire.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image-3997486219.jpg
Views:	699
Size:	71.2 KB
ID:	373322   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-494389193.jpg
Views:	563
Size:	40.3 KB
ID:	373323   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-3193309226.jpg
Views:	536
Size:	44.3 KB
ID:	373324  
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.