Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

35's on 15's vs 37's on 17's

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 13, 2015 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
ricky-2012jku's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default 35's on 15's vs 37's on 17's

Hello,
I'm not really looking for which is better nor pros and cons. But would like to ask a question about why there is such a negative view of 35's on 15's. But not 37's in 17's. Each set up is the same ratio. I've been on the fence about upgrading wheels or just getting 35's for my 15's. The only real negative that everyone seems to think is possible squishy ride and handling due to extra tires. I haven't read that about the 37 on 17 setup. Why is that ? Many guys run 17s with 35's. But I just don't see how one more inch of rim and one less inch of tire could possible affect the ride or handling to the point that it would be noticeable. Am I missing something? I almost feel as if it's just one of those things where owners think something because it's been said so much but who knows either way thanks for any responses.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2015 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
Albino Lizard's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Merced, ca
Default

There probably isn't much difference when comparing the two sizes you mentioned. If you compare equal tire sizes the larger rim vehicle will have less tire roll and better on road handling. I think there would be a much larger problem going to a 37 on a 15 rim.

I read an article in jp one time that compared two tires on different size rims. Pretty interesting.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2015 | 09:05 PM
  #3  
nthinuf's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 165
From: Austin <--> Colorado Springs
Default

The negative comments about 15's - are they talking about backspacing requirements? Or caliper clearance? Or rod end clearance? Or the lack of aftermarket big brake upgrades? Or the fact that tire mfg's seem to be moving away from that size? All can be valid concerns. But the ratio when compared to the 37" setup you listed, not so much...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2015 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
ricky-2012jku's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

Originally Posted by nthinuf
The negative comments about 15's - are they talking about backspacing requirements? Or caliper clearance? Or rod end clearance? Or the lack of aftermarket big brake upgrades? Or the fact that tire mfg's seem to be moving away from that size? All can be valid concerns. But the ratio when compared to the 37" setup you listed, not so much...
All of the above. But none seem to be a real issues at the 35 tire size.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2015 | 09:43 PM
  #5  
nthinuf's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 165
From: Austin <--> Colorado Springs
Default

Yeah, comments on sidewall ratio come up all the time when people ask about 20" rims, but I don't think I have seen anyone else mention it in connection with 15's.

For 15's, all of the other considerations can very well come into play, though, and should all at least be considered when thinking about possible future build plans.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 04:28 AM
  #6  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Do it, the 35s that is, you'll be fine. I ran 35s and 37s with a 15" wheel with no issues.

I will say this though, my current set up of 37s on a 17 is a bit more firm than the 35s or 37s on a 15" wheel because the 37x13.5-17 is a E rated tire where the 35-37 for the 15s were Cs.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 04:40 AM
  #7  
Saharaunlmtd's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by ricky-2012jku
Hello, I'm not really looking for which is better nor pros and cons. But would like to ask a question about why there is such a negative view of 35's on 15's. But not 37's in 17's. Each set up is the same ratio. I've been on the fence about upgrading wheels or just getting 35's for my 15's. The only real negative that everyone seems to think is possible squishy ride and handling due to extra tires. I haven't read that about the 37 on 17 setup. Why is that ? Many guys run 17s with 35's. But I just don't see how one more inch of rim and one less inch of tire could possible affect the ride or handling to the point that it would be noticeable. Am I missing something? I almost feel as if it's just one of those things where owners think something because it's been said so much but who knows either way thanks for any responses.
I run 35s on 15s with a very heavy / top heavy JK and I have no complaints about it feeling squishy. Does it feel different then the stock 32" KMs in 17s, yes but any size change isn't going to go completely unnoticed.



Click image for larger version

Name:	image-3782260296.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	454.8 KB
ID:	624478
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 05:28 AM
  #8  
GJK's Avatar
GJK
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Same here, I run 35s on 15s and I have no problems with ride. Let's not forget that it's a Jeep not a race car. If your plans include extensive suspension and drivetrain upgrades then just go with 17s, for the above mentioned fitment problems.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 07:40 AM
  #9  
CajunTiger's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: Houma, La
Default

I had 35's on 17's on my 2011 2door and had no issues at all. With south Louisiana roads made like a wash board used for washing rocks, the steering wheel didn't jump out of my hands. I had a 3" BDS suspension lift and handled great.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 AM.