Brake dust question
I don't think I've ever seen or heard of worn out rear brakes before the fronts. A majority of your stopping force comes from the front, therefore you eat through more pad subsequently causing more brake dust. Have you owned the Jeep since new? Maybe the last owner changed the fronts and not the rears and that is why you are thinking it is opposite.
I don't think I've ever seen or heard of worn out rear brakes before the fronts. A majority of your stopping force comes from the front, therefore you eat through more pad subsequently causing more brake dust. Have you owned the Jeep since new? Maybe the last owner changed the fronts and not the rears and that is why you are thinking it is opposite.
It surprises a lot of folks at first but no news there. It seems rear pads are wearing out 2:1 over the fronts.
I don't think I've ever seen or heard of worn out rear brakes before the fronts. A majority of your stopping force comes from the front, therefore you eat through more pad subsequently causing more brake dust. Have you owned the Jeep since new? Maybe the last owner changed the fronts and not the rears and that is why you are thinking it is opposite.
I know up that a lot of vehicles today are biased more toward the rear than ever before. Maybe because the surface area of the pad itself is the answer? I mean look at the size of the pad material vs the rear. Even though the rear pads may wear out more quickly, there is more material/surface area on the rotors in front, therefore more dust. That's my theory?
Twinkydog may be on to something. The front and rear brakes are made differently. The front disk is just a disk. The rear brakes use a combination of disk and drum. The drum is inside the disk and only used for emergency/park brake.
Trending Topics
Nope, this is my first JK (lots of Jeeps though) and I've only put 4k miles on it. I've always done my own brakes (and most of my friends) and I've always done the fronts first. Thanks for the heads up on the JK. Seems against principal that the JK would be rear biased in the brake department, but what do I know.
Nope, this is my first JK (lots of Jeeps though) and I've only put 4k miles on it. I've always done my own brakes (and most of my friends) and I've always done the fronts first. Thanks for the heads up on the JK. Seems against principal that the JK would be rear biased in the brake department, but what do I know.
Earlier systems could not do that without risk of locking up the rear brakes.
Harder braking is still the job of the bigger front brakes.
My '01 VW Golf wears out the rear pads faster than the fronts, too.



