Notices
Stock JK Tech Bulletin board forum regarding issues with OE (original equipment) components of the Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) such as factory suspension parts, engine, transmission, body parts, interior fixtures and the on-board computer.

if you go no bigger then 33" tires would a 3.73 and 4.10 rubi be equal off road?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
stoop14's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: whitehorse
Default if you go no bigger then 33" tires would a 3.73 and 4.10 rubi be equal off road?

As the title states if i go no bigger then 33" tires would a rubi with 3.73 be just as capable off road as a rubi with 33" tires and 4.10?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 12:39 PM
  #2  
justjeff's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Aberdeen, MD
Default

I would have to say no. Although both are pretty capable vehicles I think the lockers and the gearing in the transfer would make a difference. What kind of wheeling do you do?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 01:19 PM
  #3  
stoop14's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: whitehorse
Default

their both rubis.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 01:21 PM
  #4  
otservice's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 310
Likes: 1
From: BC
Default

Based on 3.73 vs 4.10 gearing it won't make a noticeable difference to most people. They are both Rubi's so they are same given everything else with same size tires. Obviously if one had 35" tires then that one would be better than the one with 33" tires.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 02:55 PM
  #5  
Delux2769's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
From: Quinlan, TX
Default

On the newer 3.6 motors, you won't feel a difference in 4.10 and 3.73 gears with 33" tires.

I you plan on going to 35"s though, find one with 4.10.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 04:24 PM
  #6  
scooby snacks's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,343
Likes: 1
From: Wake Forest, NC
Default

33's with 3.73s will be acceptable, meaning you won't be disappointed. I have 4.10's with 35's and it's just about right... much better than my previous 2011 Rubi that had 4.10's and factory tires!!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 05:25 PM
  #7  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

If you drove them back to back, you would definitely feel the difference. I would go with the 4.10's if given the choice
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 24, 2012 | 06:49 PM
  #8  
TheTerminator's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by stoop14
As the title states if i go no bigger then 33" tires would a rubi with 3.73 be just as capable off road as a rubi with 33" tires and 4.10?
The difference is too insignificant to be a concern off road. But if you have a free choice, go with 4.10.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 07:29 PM
  #9  
mntdriver's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: High Altitude
Default

Originally Posted by otservice
Obviously if one had 35" tires then that one would be better than the one with 33" tires.
Not true. The wrangler with the 35" tires has more ground clearance than the Wrangler with the 33" tires....that's all. It's certainly not "better".
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 08:43 PM
  #10  
JKZinger's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: Sahuarita, Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by mntdriver

Not true. The wrangler with the 35" tires has more ground clearance than the Wrangler with the 33" tires....that's all. It's certainly not "better".
It absolutely would be for off roading purposes.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 PM.