Anybody have pics of 4-4.5" lift with 33s?
#21
JK Freak
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#22
JK Super Freak
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My local dealer installed the rebranded Mopar 4" lift on a 2 and 4 door JK...both had 33" tires and it was not that bad. But, they were 33x12.5 which helped them not look goofy. Personally, I want the biggest tires that I can fit under my rig at all times. :-)
Last edited by shredX; 11-24-2009 at 04:56 AM.
#24
JK Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I feel like rollerskating now. Been a while...
Looks absolutely ABSURD! 33s are meant for, AT MOST, 2.5" of suspension lift. Even then, with chopped flares, looks funny.
Looks absolutely ABSURD! 33s are meant for, AT MOST, 2.5" of suspension lift. Even then, with chopped flares, looks funny.
#25
JK Jedi Master
#28
JK Jedi Master
#29
JK Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plus, that ProComp lift is DEFINITELY not giving you 4" of lift. Many of these companies state a certain height, yet fail to get to that height by an inch. If you install a TF 4" lift, take a pic and post it here. It'll be a lot higher than that.
Hell, my TF BB seems to of looked that way when I didn't chop the flares yet with 33s.
[IMG][/IMG]
Yup, it sure does.
#30
You are correct. What I mean is that there are threads and threads debating the subject of the necessity to re-gear with 35's. For those in flat terrains who only drive to church on Sunday, or those who want the look and don't care about performance, or those who only wheel a little...etc., etc. The loss of power, the strain on stock parts...all those things need to be factored in to make a decision regarding going 35. With 4 inches and 33's, no regearing is necessary. 315's (which are really 34 inches), or 35's -- the decisions mount.