? of the day.
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Alleghany, Virginia
? of the day.
When they made the JK, why didnt they put the 3.7L Magnum that the commanders have, in the JK? I bought my wife a 2010 Commander for Christmas and that engine is ridiculous compared to the 3.8L in the JK.
JK Junkie
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,908
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Another question ...why didn't Chrysler put the V6 from the dodge ram in the JK?
JK Freak
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, NY
or even the 4.0 minivan v6?
I'm not one to complain about the engine... it is what it is. but it seems there were much better option to choose from. I'm pretty sure the wrangler is the only vehicle that still has the 3.8
I'm not one to complain about the engine... it is what it is. but it seems there were much better option to choose from. I'm pretty sure the wrangler is the only vehicle that still has the 3.8
Trending Topics
JK Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: under your skin, usa
My theroy is the 3.8 has the best fuel economy options while used in the jeep. Sure they could've put in a v8 but chrysler v8s are notorious for sucking gas. Its all about mpg not power. Just my. 02
JK Freak
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, VA
I had that exact model prior to my JK...it would roll! That being said, still have way more fun in the JK than I ever did in the Durango!