Future Jeeps may be made by one of the Axis powers
Spank, how do you know I don't? 
Gort, Ford's loan was to implement government mandated changes to their vehicle production mix to comply with EPA and DOE mandates. Not to expand or increase sale of vehicles people actually want to buy that would increase company bottom line. And.... it was a loan, not a bailout. GM auto company still owes $27 Billion and Ally Bank (formerly GMAC) owes $14.7 Billion.
Raise your children to be hard workers because most of their labor for generations to come will be to pay off the debts we have accumulated. (Thus global "redistribution of wealth".)

Gort, Ford's loan was to implement government mandated changes to their vehicle production mix to comply with EPA and DOE mandates. Not to expand or increase sale of vehicles people actually want to buy that would increase company bottom line. And.... it was a loan, not a bailout. GM auto company still owes $27 Billion and Ally Bank (formerly GMAC) owes $14.7 Billion.
Raise your children to be hard workers because most of their labor for generations to come will be to pay off the debts we have accumulated. (Thus global "redistribution of wealth".)
Well since some real Jeeps are assembled in Egypt then it would be easy to move assembly to Italy. The upside is that Jeeps made overseas are platforms from the USA. So they would be still creating American jobs.
Not sure how an Italian made Jeep would translate, but a US built Honda is still a Honda and a US built Mercedes is still a Mercedes, so maybe an Italian built Jeep could still be a Jeep.
Gort, Ford's loan was to implement government mandated changes to their vehicle production mix to comply with EPA and DOE mandates. Not to expand or increase sale of vehicles people actually want to buy that would increase company bottom line. And.... it was a loan, not a bailout. GM auto company still owes $27 Billion and Ally Bank (formerly GMAC) owes $14.7 Billion.
Likewise, the money wasted on GM was also a "loan". Don't you recall all the strutting and prancing recently when GM was trying to make us believe that they repaid all the money to the Feds (instead of telling us that they borrowed money to pay back the bailout loan)?
I've got no problem with Ford overall. I think Ford's trucks are great, and I'll definitely buy another F-150 at some point in the future. The problem that I have isn't with Ford in particular, it's with big companies that pay little to no taxes but turn around and borrow taxpayer money (probably at a loss to the government) when the little guys that actually provide that tax money can't get the same loans.
IMO, the government shouldn't lend money -- period. Maybe then they'll stop stealing so much of mine and the rest of the 50% that actually pay taxes.
Just for full disclosure, I'm the really, really disgruntled owner of a boatload of "old GM" stock, which is, of course, worthless. I wouldn't have a problem with this if it were simply the foibles of the market that made it worthless, but it was the specific acts of the government, GM, courts, and unions that both figuratively and literally STOLE my money from me to enrich the unions, government, and others associated with GM. So yeah, I'm a bit sensitive to any company that gets in bed with the government and tries to deny it.
Government, at all levels, mandates that I do things or purchase things and is wholly unwilling to loan ME money to cover the expense of complying with their mandate. So no, I've got no sympathy for Ford in this case and to me, they're just as bad as GM.
Just my 2 cents.
Last edited by Gort; Oct 15, 2012 at 08:03 PM.
First of all, there are a lot of "could's" in that article.
Second, It says it does not know which vehicles would be built overseas, there was no mention of a JK.
Third, it also says that the US factories are at "full Capacity".
So, what if they decide to move production of the Patriot to Italy while keeping JK's in The US and increase production of JK's both here and abroad. Is this a bad thing?
Second, It says it does not know which vehicles would be built overseas, there was no mention of a JK.
Third, it also says that the US factories are at "full Capacity".
So, what if they decide to move production of the Patriot to Italy while keeping JK's in The US and increase production of JK's both here and abroad. Is this a bad thing?
Originally Posted by sully151
First of all, there are a lot of "could's" in that article.
Second, It says it does not know which vehicles would be built overseas, there was no mention of a JK.
Third, it also says that the US factories are at "full Capacity".
So, what if they decide to move production of the Patriot to Italy while keeping JK's in The US and increase production of JK's both here and abroad. Is this a bad thing?
Second, It says it does not know which vehicles would be built overseas, there was no mention of a JK.
Third, it also says that the US factories are at "full Capacity".
So, what if they decide to move production of the Patriot to Italy while keeping JK's in The US and increase production of JK's both here and abroad. Is this a bad thing?




